Difference between revisions of "Law"
m |
m |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|title=PRIMO.ai | |title=PRIMO.ai | ||
|titlemode=append | |titlemode=append | ||
| − | |keywords=artificial, intelligence, machine, learning, models | + | |keywords=ChatGPT, artificial, intelligence, machine, learning, GPT-4, GPT-5, NLP, NLG, NLC, NLU, models, data, singularity, moonshot, Sentience, AGI, Emergence, Moonshot, Explainable, TensorFlow, Google, Nvidia, Microsoft, Azure, Amazon, AWS, Hugging Face, OpenAI, Tensorflow, OpenAI, Google, Nvidia, Microsoft, Azure, Amazon, AWS, Meta, LLM, metaverse, assistants, agents, digital twin, IoT, Transhumanism, Immersive Reality, Generative AI, Conversational AI, Perplexity, Bing, You, Bard, Ernie, prompt Engineering LangChain, Video/Image, Vision, End-to-End Speech, Synthesize Speech, Speech Recognition, Stanford, MIT |description=Helpful resources for your journey with artificial intelligence; videos, articles, techniques, courses, profiles, and tools |
| − | |description=Helpful resources for your journey with artificial intelligence; videos, articles, techniques, courses, profiles, and tools | + | |
| + | <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> | ||
| + | <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-4GCWLBVJ7T"></script> | ||
| + | <script> | ||
| + | window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; | ||
| + | function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} | ||
| + | gtag('js', new Date()); | ||
| + | |||
| + | gtag('config', 'G-4GCWLBVJ7T'); | ||
| + | </script> | ||
}} | }} | ||
[https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ai+law+lawyer YouTube] | [https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ai+law+lawyer YouTube] | ||
| Line 11: | Line 20: | ||
[https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=ai+law+lawyer&qft=interval%3d%228%22 ...Bing News] | [https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=ai+law+lawyer&qft=interval%3d%228%22 ...Bing News] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* [[Risk, Compliance and Regulation]] ... [[Ethics]] ... [[Privacy]] ... [[Law]] ... [[AI Governance]] ... [[AI Verification and Validation]] | * [[Risk, Compliance and Regulation]] ... [[Ethics]] ... [[Privacy]] ... [[Law]] ... [[AI Governance]] ... [[AI Verification and Validation]] | ||
| + | * [[Law Enforcement]] | ||
| + | * [[Writing/Publishing#Legally| Writing/Publishing Legally]] | ||
| + | * [[Cybersecurity]] ... [[Open-Source Intelligence - OSINT |OSINT]] ... [[Cybersecurity Frameworks, Architectures & Roadmaps | Frameworks]] ... [[Cybersecurity References|References]] ... [[Offense - Adversarial Threats/Attacks| Offense]] ... [[National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)|NIST]] ... [[U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)| DHS]] ... [[Screening; Passenger, Luggage, & Cargo|Screening]] ... [[Law Enforcement]] ... [[Government Services|Government]] ... [[Defense]] ... [[Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)#Cybersecurity & Acquisition Lifecycle Integration| Lifecycle Integration]] ... [[Cybersecurity Companies/Products|Products]] ... [[Cybersecurity: Evaluating & Selling|Evaluating]] | ||
| + | * [[Agents]] ... [[Robotic Process Automation (RPA)|Robotic Process Automation]] ... [[Assistants]] ... [[Personal Companions]] ... [[Personal Productivity|Productivity]] ... [[Email]] ... [[Negotiation]] ... [[LangChain]] | ||
* [[Other Challenges]] in Artificial Intelligence | * [[Other Challenges]] in Artificial Intelligence | ||
* [[Bias and Variances]] | * [[Bias and Variances]] | ||
* [[Policy]] ... [[Policy vs Plan]] ... [[Constitutional AI]] ... [[Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO)]] ... [[Policy Gradient (PG)]] ... [[Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)]] | * [[Policy]] ... [[Policy vs Plan]] ... [[Constitutional AI]] ... [[Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO)]] ... [[Policy Gradient (PG)]] ... [[Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)]] | ||
| − | * | + | * [[Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) to Singularity]] ... [[Inside Out - Curious Optimistic Reasoning| Curious Reasoning]] ... [[Emergence]] ... [[Moonshots]] ... [[Explainable / Interpretable AI|Explainable AI]] ... [[Algorithm Administration#Automated Learning|Automated Learning]] |
* [[Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)#Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)|Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)]] | * [[Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)#Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)|Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)]] | ||
| − | * [[Graph]] | + | * [[Excel]] ... [[LangChain#Documents|Documents]] ... [[Database|Database; Vector & Relational]] ... [[Graph]] ... [[LlamaIndex]] |
* [[Blockchain]] | * [[Blockchain]] | ||
* [https://www.legalsifter.com/ LegalSifter] | * [https://www.legalsifter.com/ LegalSifter] | ||
| − | * [https://premonition.ai/ knowsPremonition] generated the World's largest litigation database, and able to read and analyze over 50,000 documents a second. | + | * [https://premonition.ai/ knowsPremonition] generated the World's largest litigation [[database]], and able to read and analyze over 50,000 documents a second. |
* [https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/12/232890-ai-judges-and-juries/fulltext AI Judges and Juries | Logan Kugler - Communications of the ACM] | * [https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/12/232890-ai-judges-and-juries/fulltext AI Judges and Juries | Logan Kugler - Communications of the ACM] | ||
* [https://interestingengineering.com/ai-vs-lawyers-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-and-law AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering] | * [https://interestingengineering.com/ai-vs-lawyers-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-and-law AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering] | ||
| Line 33: | Line 40: | ||
* [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-powered-robot-lawyer-takes-its-first-court-case/ AI-powered "robot" lawyer will be first of its kind to represent defendant in court | Megan Ceerullo - CBS NEWS] | * [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-powered-robot-lawyer-takes-its-first-court-case/ AI-powered "robot" lawyer will be first of its kind to represent defendant in court | Megan Ceerullo - CBS NEWS] | ||
* [https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/02/chatgpt-law-humans-trust-ai-judges.html Would Humans Trust an A.I. Judge? More Easily Than You Think | A. Stremitzer, B. Chen, & K. Tobia - Slate] | * [https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/02/chatgpt-law-humans-trust-ai-judges.html Would Humans Trust an A.I. Judge? More Easily Than You Think | A. Stremitzer, B. Chen, & K. Tobia - Slate] | ||
| + | = Generative AI = | ||
* [[Generative AI]] ... [[OpenAI]]'s [[ChatGPT]] ... [[Perplexity]] ... [[Microsoft]]'s [[Bing]] ... [[You]] ...[[Google]]'s [[Bard]] ... [[Baidu]]'s [[Ernie]] | * [[Generative AI]] ... [[OpenAI]]'s [[ChatGPT]] ... [[Perplexity]] ... [[Microsoft]]'s [[Bing]] ... [[You]] ...[[Google]]'s [[Bard]] ... [[Baidu]]'s [[Ernie]] | ||
** [https://www.fox9.com/news/chatgpt-goes-to-university-of-minnesota-law-school-and-passes-the-final-exams ChatGPT goes to University of Minnesota law school and passes final exams | Corin Hoggard - FOX 9 KMSP] | ** [https://www.fox9.com/news/chatgpt-goes-to-university-of-minnesota-law-school-and-passes-the-final-exams ChatGPT goes to University of Minnesota law school and passes final exams | Corin Hoggard - FOX 9 KMSP] | ||
| Line 39: | Line 47: | ||
** [https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/02/generative-ai-is-coming-for-the-lawyers/ Generative AI is coming for the lawyers | Chris Stokel-Walker - Wired] ... Large law firms are using a tool made by [[OpenAI]] to research and write legal documents | ** [https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/02/generative-ai-is-coming-for-the-lawyers/ Generative AI is coming for the lawyers | Chris Stokel-Walker - Wired] ... Large law firms are using a tool made by [[OpenAI]] to research and write legal documents | ||
** [https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/03/in-generative-ai-legal-wild-west-lawsuits-are-just-getting-started.html In generative AI legal Wild West, the courtroom battles are just getting started | Ellen Sheng - CNBC] | ** [https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/03/in-generative-ai-legal-wild-west-lawsuits-are-just-getting-started.html In generative AI legal Wild West, the courtroom battles are just getting started | Ellen Sheng - CNBC] | ||
| + | ** [https://openworldai.com/plugins/lawyer-pr LawyerPR ChatGPT Plugin] ... assess various lawyers and law firms in Japan | ||
| + | ** [https://www.dlapiper.com/en/news/2023/03/dla-piper-to-utilize-cocounsel-the-groundbreaking-ai-legal-assistant-powered-by-openai-technology DLA Piper to utilize CoCounsel, the groundbreaking AI legal assistant powered by OpenAI Technology | DLA Piper] | ||
| + | ** [https://www.harvey.ai/ Harvey.ai] | ||
| + | = Advancements = | ||
{|<!-- T --> | {|<!-- T --> | ||
| valign="top" | | | valign="top" | | ||
| Line 104: | Line 116: | ||
|| | || | ||
<youtube>wwbr0fombFs</youtube> | <youtube>wwbr0fombFs</youtube> | ||
| − | <b>The world’s first AI legal [[ | + | <b>The world’s first AI legal [[assistant]] | Andrew Arruda | TED Institute |
| − | </b><br>s a lawyer, Andrew Arruda too often saw the scales of justice tip in favor of the wealthy and partnered with a computer scientist to create the world’s first artificially intelligent legal [[ | + | </b><br>s a lawyer, Andrew Arruda too often saw the scales of justice tip in favor of the wealthy and partnered with a computer scientist to create the world’s first artificially intelligent legal [[assistant]], ROSS. By speeding up legal research, Arruda wants ROSS to make the practice of law cheaper and fulfill the original promise of “justice for all.” TED@IBM was a TED-curated event produced in partnership with IBM. The third installment of TED@IBM brought a diverse collection of speakers and performers who recognize that ingenuity starts with one thing: a spark. And regardless of where the spark takes hold, inspiration demands action to reach its greatest potential. About the TED Institute: We know that innovative ideas and fresh approaches to challenging problems can be discovered inside visionary companies around the world. The TED Institute helps surface and share these insights. Every year, TED works with a group of select companies and foundations to identify internal ideators, inventors, connectors, and creators. Drawing on the same rigorous regimen that has prepared speakers for the TED main stage, TED Institute works closely with each partner, overseeing curation and providing intensive one-on-one talk [[development]] to sharpen and fine tune ideas. |
|} | |} | ||
|<!-- M --> | |<!-- M --> | ||
| Line 147: | Line 159: | ||
<youtube>kn3mxs_tOBk</youtube> | <youtube>kn3mxs_tOBk</youtube> | ||
<b>Machine Learning applied to judicial decisions - Danilo Mendes & Yan Teixeira (Legal Labs) | <b>Machine Learning applied to judicial decisions - Danilo Mendes & Yan Teixeira (Legal Labs) | ||
| − | </b><br>The need for technology applied to the legal sector has been a very relevant issue in the Brazilian scenario. The volume of processes is huge and the traditional methods of process analysis and execution no longer account for the demand. The process was physical, then turned digital, we inaugurated the next phase: intelligence on the mass litigations. The amount of Brazilian lawsuits shows a crisis scenario that is, at the same time, an important generator of opportunities. In this talk, we show how we developed Dra. Luzia, who was trained to make decisions in mass litigations. To do so, we elucidate how data mining and the application of machine learning, including deep learning, were applied in the development of the Artificial Intelligence platform Dra. Luzia. We believe that the Brazilian Judiciary will begin to use IA soon. This will directly impact the speed of procedural steps. Danilo Mendes: Researcher, Developer and Project Manager at Legal Labs with a degree in Software Engineering from the University of Brasília. He has worked on embedded projects to help disabled people and in web and mobile applications for companies and institutions. He was a researcher at California State University, Fullerton, with the goal of re-creating multidimensional sound for hearing aids. Participated in the conception, creation and development of Dr. Luzia. | + | </b><br>The need for technology applied to the legal sector has been a very relevant issue in the Brazilian scenario. The volume of processes is huge and the traditional methods of process analysis and execution no longer account for the demand. The process was physical, then turned digital, we inaugurated the next phase: intelligence on the mass litigations. The amount of Brazilian lawsuits shows a crisis scenario that is, at the same time, an important generator of opportunities. In this talk, we show how we developed Dra. Luzia, who was trained to make decisions in mass litigations. To do so, we elucidate how data mining and the application of machine learning, including deep learning, were applied in the [[development]] of the Artificial Intelligence platform Dra. Luzia. We believe that the Brazilian Judiciary will begin to use IA soon. This will directly impact the speed of procedural steps. Danilo Mendes: Researcher, Developer and Project Manager at Legal Labs with a degree in Software Engineering from the University of Brasília. He has worked on embedded projects to help disabled people and in web and mobile applications for companies and institutions. He was a researcher at California State University, Fullerton, with the goal of re-creating multidimensional sound for hearing aids. Participated in the conception, creation and [[development]] of Dr. Luzia. |
|} | |} | ||
|}<!-- B --> | |}<!-- B --> | ||
| Line 185: | Line 197: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | ||
|| | || | ||
| − | <youtube> | + | <youtube>bX19pKW_FYs</youtube> |
| − | <b> | + | <b>AI and Smart Contracts | Sergey Nazarov and Lex Fridman |
| − | </b><br> | + | </b><br>Sergey Nazarov is the CEO of Chainlink, a decentralized oracle network that provides data to smart contracts. |
|} | |} | ||
|}<!-- B --> | |}<!-- B --> | ||
| Line 198: | Line 210: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | ||
|| | || | ||
| − | <youtube> | + | <youtube>eiinDs9sS1g</youtube> |
| − | <b> | + | <b>AI, [[Blockchain]], and Beyond Exploring the Future of Technology and IP Law with Enrico Schaefer |
| − | </b><br> | + | </b><br>Are you struggling to navigate the complex world of technology and intellectual property law? Do you find the intersection of AI and machine learning with the legal industry overwhelming? Join us on The Law Spot, where we speak with technology lawyer Enrico Schaefer as he shares his invaluable insights and expertise on these emerging technologies and how you can protect your business. |
|} | |} | ||
|<!-- M --> | |<!-- M --> | ||
| Line 259: | Line 271: | ||
</b><br>United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2017 Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference | </b><br>United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2017 Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference | ||
| − | Artificial Intelligence Today—Tomorrow's Legal Challenges of Machine Learning Once an area limited primarily to academic study, Artificial Intelligence ("AI") now enables a constellation of technologies that we take for granted such as Internet search algorithms; computer and phone speech [[ | + | Artificial Intelligence Today—Tomorrow's Legal Challenges of Machine Learning Once an area limited primarily to academic study, Artificial Intelligence ("AI") now enables a constellation of technologies that we take for granted such as Internet search algorithms; computer and phone speech [[assistants]]; self-driving cars; health care diagnostics; investment platforms; industrial robots; and home heating; cooling and security. This is just the beginning. AI technology is growing rapidly. As it grows, it will not merely be an aid to human activity, but a powerful force that reshapes our world, our thinking, our lives, and our constitutional principles. In this panel presentation we discuss what AI is, its status today, what the future might hold, and some of the critical issues courts may face in addressing the impact of AI. Introduction: Michelle M. Pettit, Assistant U.S. Attorney, CAS At-Large Member, Conference Executive Committee |
Speakers: | Speakers: | ||
| Line 274: | Line 286: | ||
...recent artificial intelligence case, in which the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that an AI system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. Unlike US patent law, US copyright law does not have an express requirement of human authorship; however, US courts and the US Copyright Office generally operate on the basis of this requirement and deny registrations of works not created by humans. In fact, the Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices—a manual produced by the US Copyright Office, intended for use primarily by the Copyright Office staff as a general guide to policies and procedures such as registration, deposit and recordation—states, “the term ‘authorship’ implies that, for a work to be copyrightable, it must owe its origin to a human being”. Materials produced solely by nature, by plants, or by animals are not copyrightable. The metaverse could have virtual creations by avatars and AI aspects built into them. If such creations are deemed to be AI creations and not human creations, they may not be allowed certain types of intellectual property protection. [https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/a-brief-overview-of-the-metaverse-and-9541020/ A Brief Overview of the Metaverse and the Legal Challenges It Will Present | Rahul Kapoor & Shokoh Yaghoubi - JDSUPRA] | ...recent artificial intelligence case, in which the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that an AI system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. Unlike US patent law, US copyright law does not have an express requirement of human authorship; however, US courts and the US Copyright Office generally operate on the basis of this requirement and deny registrations of works not created by humans. In fact, the Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices—a manual produced by the US Copyright Office, intended for use primarily by the Copyright Office staff as a general guide to policies and procedures such as registration, deposit and recordation—states, “the term ‘authorship’ implies that, for a work to be copyrightable, it must owe its origin to a human being”. Materials produced solely by nature, by plants, or by animals are not copyrightable. The metaverse could have virtual creations by avatars and AI aspects built into them. If such creations are deemed to be AI creations and not human creations, they may not be allowed certain types of intellectual property protection. [https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/a-brief-overview-of-the-metaverse-and-9541020/ A Brief Overview of the Metaverse and the Legal Challenges It Will Present | Rahul Kapoor & Shokoh Yaghoubi - JDSUPRA] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == <span id="Amnesty International"></span>Amnesty International == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Amnesty International is fighting the use of AI to abuse human rights in a number of ways, including: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Research and advocacy: Amnesty International conducts research on the impact of AI on human rights, and uses this research to advocate for policies and practices that protect human rights. For example, Amnesty International has called for a ban on the use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement, and for the development of ethical AI principles that are based on human rights. | ||
| + | * Collaboration with other organizations: Amnesty International collaborates with other organizations, such as the European Parliament and the United Nations, to raise awareness of the human rights risks of AI and to advocate for solutions. | ||
| + | * Legal action: Amnesty International has taken legal action against companies and governments that use AI in ways that violate human rights. For example, Amnesty International has filed a lawsuit against Clearview AI, a company that collects and sells facial recognition data without people's consent. | ||
| + | * Public education: Amnesty International educates the public about the human rights risks of AI, and encourages people to take action to protect their rights. For example, Amnesty International has launched a campaign to raise awareness of the use of AI in mass surveillance. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Amnesty International's work to fight the use of AI to abuse human rights is important because AI has the potential to be a powerful tool for good or for harm. By working to ensure that AI is used in a way that respects human rights, Amnesty International is helping to create a more just and equitable world. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here are some specific examples of Amnesty International's work on this issue: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * In 2019, Amnesty International published a report called "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Rights". The report found that AI is being used in ways that violate a wide range of human rights, including the right to privacy, the right to freedom of expression, and the right to a fair trial. | ||
| + | * In 2020, Amnesty International launched a campaign called "Ban the Scan". The campaign calls for a ban on the use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement. | ||
| + | * In 2021, Amnesty International filed a lawsuit against Clearview AI, a company that collects and sells facial recognition data without people's consent. The lawsuit alleges that Clearview AI's practices violate the privacy rights of millions of people. | ||
Latest revision as of 08:06, 23 March 2024
YouTube ... Quora ...Google search ...Google News ...Bing News
- Risk, Compliance and Regulation ... Ethics ... Privacy ... Law ... AI Governance ... AI Verification and Validation
- Law Enforcement
- Writing/Publishing Legally
- Cybersecurity ... OSINT ... Frameworks ... References ... Offense ... NIST ... DHS ... Screening ... Law Enforcement ... Government ... Defense ... Lifecycle Integration ... Products ... Evaluating
- Agents ... Robotic Process Automation ... Assistants ... Personal Companions ... Productivity ... Email ... Negotiation ... LangChain
- Other Challenges in Artificial Intelligence
- Bias and Variances
- Policy ... Policy vs Plan ... Constitutional AI ... Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) ... Policy Gradient (PG) ... Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)
- Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) to Singularity ... Curious Reasoning ... Emergence ... Moonshots ... Explainable AI ... Automated Learning
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)
- Excel ... Documents ... Database; Vector & Relational ... Graph ... LlamaIndex
- Blockchain
- LegalSifter
- knowsPremonition generated the World's largest litigation database, and able to read and analyze over 50,000 documents a second.
- AI Judges and Juries | Logan Kugler - Communications of the ACM
- AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering
- Bnh.ai ...a law firm focused on AI ...Sample AI Incident Response Checklist
- Could a stranger hijack your smart home? | Vanity Fair Perhaps most alarming of all is that hijacking an Amazon Echo does not appear to violate any existing laws. Our antiquated U.S. legal code hasn’t caught up with the likes of smart devices, and it’s legal—though “counter to the public interest,” per the Federal Communications Commission—to broadcast subliminal messages via machine. Subliminal messages may be considered a violation of privacy, but that concept has not been successfully extended in court to machines. At least not yet.
- AI-powered "robot" lawyer will be first of its kind to represent defendant in court | Megan Ceerullo - CBS NEWS
- Would Humans Trust an A.I. Judge? More Easily Than You Think | A. Stremitzer, B. Chen, & K. Tobia - Slate
Contents
Generative AI
- Generative AI ... OpenAI's ChatGPT ... Perplexity ... Microsoft's Bing ... You ...Google's Bard ... Baidu's Ernie
- ChatGPT goes to University of Minnesota law school and passes final exams | Corin Hoggard - FOX 9 KMSP
- How To Write An Affidavit with the help of ChatGPT in 2023? | John Williams - Its ChatGPT
- Judge Uses ChatGPT in Medical Rights Case in Colombia | Nikki Main - Gizmodo
- Generative AI is coming for the lawyers | Chris Stokel-Walker - Wired ... Large law firms are using a tool made by OpenAI to research and write legal documents
- In generative AI legal Wild West, the courtroom battles are just getting started | Ellen Sheng - CNBC
- LawyerPR ChatGPT Plugin ... assess various lawyers and law firms in Japan
- DLA Piper to utilize CoCounsel, the groundbreaking AI legal assistant powered by OpenAI Technology | DLA Piper
- Harvey.ai
Advancements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extracting Legal Data
|
|
Contracts
|
|
Blockchain, AI and Law
|
|
Artificial Intelligence and Law – An Overview and History
Artificial Intelligence LawYouTube search... ...Google search Having a usable definition of AI – and soon – is vital for regulation and governance because laws and policies simply will not operate without one. This definition problem crops up in all regulatory contexts, from ensuring truthful use of the term “AI” in product advertising right through to establishing how next-generation automated weapons systems (AWSs) are treated under the laws of war. ________________________________________
Intellectual Property (IP) Ownership...recent artificial intelligence case, in which the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that an AI system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. Unlike US patent law, US copyright law does not have an express requirement of human authorship; however, US courts and the US Copyright Office generally operate on the basis of this requirement and deny registrations of works not created by humans. In fact, the Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices—a manual produced by the US Copyright Office, intended for use primarily by the Copyright Office staff as a general guide to policies and procedures such as registration, deposit and recordation—states, “the term ‘authorship’ implies that, for a work to be copyrightable, it must owe its origin to a human being”. Materials produced solely by nature, by plants, or by animals are not copyrightable. The metaverse could have virtual creations by avatars and AI aspects built into them. If such creations are deemed to be AI creations and not human creations, they may not be allowed certain types of intellectual property protection. A Brief Overview of the Metaverse and the Legal Challenges It Will Present | Rahul Kapoor & Shokoh Yaghoubi - JDSUPRA Amnesty InternationalAmnesty International is fighting the use of AI to abuse human rights in a number of ways, including:
Here are some specific examples of Amnesty International's work on this issue:
|