Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)

From
Revision as of 13:38, 11 July 2024 by BPeat (talk | contribs) (→‎Adaptive Acquisition Framework Methods (Pathways))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Youtube search... ...Google search


Integrated Product Support Implementation Roadmap ...List ... Timeline ... Alternate

Adaptive Acquisition Framework (AAF)

The AAF is a major advancement for modern defense acquisition. It is more than a policy update. It is policy re-envisioned and restructured in a framework that encourages critical thinking by program managers in selecting and tailoring the best suited approach or pathway for a particular acquisition. It facilitates more rapid delivery to the point of need. The AAF acquisition pathways provide opportunities for MDAs/DAs and PMs to develop acquisition strategies and employ acquisition processes that match the characteristics of the capability being acquired.



5000.02 Hybrid Program Model A (Hardware Dominant) ...


Adaptive Acquisition Framework Methods (Pathways)

Urgent Capability Acquisition (UCA) 5000.81

Need identified by Commanders involved in an ongoing contingency operation or emergent need.

Middle-Tier Acquisition (MTA) 5000.84

Programs that are intended to be completed in a period of 2-5 years via two acquisition pathways.

Major Capability Acquisition (MCA) 5000.85

Execute to the standard defense acquisition model with modifications.

Software Acquisition

To facilitate rapid and iterative delivery of software capability to the user.

Defense Business Systems (DBS) 5000.75

Business systems are information systems that are operated by, for, or on behalf of the DOD.

Acquisition of Services 5000.74

Acquisition of contracted services from private sector entities by or for the DOD.

Prototyping & Experiments

Early Prototyping 3201.01

Technology or capability that is being matured by the research laboratories.

10 USC 2373: Procurement for Experimental Purposes: Rapid acquisition tool for fielding and testing new capabilities

Overview



Click: JCIDS Process Flow Chart (pdf)

AcqNotes Videos

DOD Acquisition Process
AcqNotes The Defense Acquisition Process July 16, 2017

DOD JCIDS Process Overview
AcqNotes Nov 4, 2012

PPBE Process Overview
AcqNotes This tutorial provides an overview of the Programming, Planning, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) Process. Nov 12, 2012

Software Development Process Tutorial
A description of the software development process and its associated aspects. Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)

U.S. Army

F102 Joint and Army Capability Development JCIDS AY17
Delta Group

F102 Joint and Army Capability Development JCIDS AY17
Delta Group

Resource Management
James Kennedy This video supports the CGSC F100 Force Management Core Curriculum block of instruction.

F100 - Fiscal Stewardship
James Kennedy This lesson is designed to supplement the CGSC F100 Force Management.

Cybersecurity & Acquisition Lifecycle Integration

Understanding what these processes are and how they interact will lead to better acquisition outcomes. The Cybersecurity & Acquisition Lifecycle Integration Tool (CALIT) provides the user the insight into these supporting processes and the ability to visualize how these processes work together to promote cyber resilient weapon systems.

2020-10-09-csiac-policy-chart-e1602511053113.jpg DOD Cybersecurity Policy Chart | Cyber Security & Information Systems Information Analysis Center ...Changelog


Cybersecurity in the Defense Acquisition System
Software Engineering Institute | Carnegie Mellon University Watch Mark Sherman in this SEI Cyber Minute as he discusses "Enclosure 14 and Cybersecurity in the Defense Acquisition System."

Cybersecurity, Regulators, and You: How to Integrate Cybersecurity into Your Development Lifecycle
Unsecured devices are unsafe devices and will be rejected under any regulatory submission. This session will present the activities and artifacts required at each phase of development to be able to create a secure medical device. This industry-recognized process is manageable, predictable, and supplies the artifacts needed for regulatory submission. In addition, we will detail what Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs) are, and how they are created, distributed, used, and managed for the supported life of the product.

Insights

How to create a capability model
Raj Ramesh The capability model is one of the foundational models to understand the capabilities of the enterprise. It is often used as the basis of other analyses such as process analysis, spend analysis, prioritization of work, etc. So it behooves the enterprise to create and have one capability model that is common for the whole enterprise. How do you start this exercise? In this video, I explain precisely that. Background Music attribution:: Across the Room - YouTube - Letter Box Here's what I can do to help you. I speak on the topics of architecture and AI, help you integrate AI into your organization, educate your team on what AI can or cannot do, and make things simple enough that you can take action from your new knowledge. I work with your organization to understand the nuances and challenges that you face, and together we can understand, frame, analyze, and address challenges in a systematic way so you see improvement in your overall business, is aligned with your strategy, and most importantly, you and your organization can incrementally change to transform and thrive in the future. If any of this sounds like something you might need, please reach out to me at dr.raj.ramesh@topsigma.com, and we'll get back in touch within a day. Thanks for watching my videos and for subscribing. www.topsigma.com www.linkedin.com/in/rajramesh

SERC TALKS: ’Mission Engineering’: Systems of Systems Engineering in Context
Today most organizational or societal capabilities rely on a mix of material and non-material ‘systems’ working together to achieve desired outcomes – to achieve their ‘mission’. Organizations typically define mission statements about why they exist – their “reason for being” -- and they use these mission statements as the basis for planning actions and investments. Government or religious organizations often form ‘mission’ teams to achieve a set of goals to share ideas or conduct negotiations. Space and defense organizations commonly refer to planned actions to achieve objectives as their ‘missions’ - e.g. US NASA Apollo mission to the moon. In most cases these include a set of objectives and a plan of actions to achieve these objectives. Recently US Defense has started to apply systems engineering concepts and practices to missions in what is being termed ‘Mission Engineering” - the deliberate planning, analyzing, organizing, and integrating of current and emerging operational and system capabilities to achieve desired mission effects. In this presentation Dr. Dahmann will discuss the motivation for employing systems approaches to mission capabilities as an extension and a broader context for application of systems of systems engineering. BIO: Dr. Judith Dahmann is a Technical Fellow at the MITRE Corporation Center and the capability lead for Systems of Systems (SoS). Dr. Dahmann is the MITRE project leader for SE Technical Support to OUSD R&E supporting mission engineering (ME) activities and the application of digital engineering to ME. She was the technical lead for development of the DOD guide for systems engineering of systems of systems (SoS) and the project lead for ISO 21839, a international standard on ‘SoS Considerations Throughout the System Life Cycle’. Dr. Dahmann is also the task lead for a set of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) SoS programs investigating advanced technology approaches to complex SoS challenges. Dr. Dahmann is an INCOSE Fellow and the co-chair of the INCOSE Systems of Systems Working Group and the co-chair of the NDIA SE Division SoS Committee. She teaches Enterprise SE as an adjunct faculty member of the Johns Hopkins University in the Systems Engineering Program for Engineering Professionals. Presented on August 5, 2020

Graphs in Government: Achieving Total Cost Visibility for the U.S. Army
Maximizing cost visibility is a common goal for large organizations, including the United States Department of Defense. The United States Army is required to track operating and support costs for weapon systems including weapons definition, force structure, inventory, requisitions, maintenance, ammunition and more. That equates to a vast amount of data and growing data management complexities. To address these challenges and achieve total cost visibility, the Army adopted the Neo4j graph database to create, manage, and analyze data relationships across the logistics community. In this webinar, Jason Zagalsky, Federal Account Manager at Neo4j, will provide a brief overview of Neo4j and Graphs In Government, followed by Preston Hendrickson, Principal Systems Analyst at CALIBRE Systems, describing how modernizing its cost tracking system gave the Army the cost visibility needed to meet DOD objectives

Resolving America’s Defense Strategy-Resource Mismatch: The Case for Cost-Per-Effect Analysis
The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies Read the report here: https://bit.ly/31WPlha Slides from presentation available here: https://bit.ly/31Unb6x To support and see more of this content, like this video and subscribe to the Mitchell Institute’s channel. The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies held a live virtual rollout of its latest report Resolving America’s Defense Strategy-Resource Mismatch: The Case for Cost-Per-Effect Analysis by Lt Gen (Ret) David A. Deptula, Dean of the Mitchell Institute, and Douglas A. Birkey, Executive Director of the Mitchell Institute. The two authors hosted a panel discussion on the need to adopt cost-per-effect assessments across the Department of Defense as the preferred measure of merit in evaluating weapon system choices. They were joined on the panel by Dr. Bill LaPlante, Senior VP and General Manager for MITRE Corporation's National Security Sector, and Brig Gen David Harris, Director of the Air Force Warfighting Integration Capability (AFWIC) and Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategy, Integration, and Requirements.


Center for Strategic & International Studies

Understanding Acquisition
Center for Strategic & International Studies While defense acquisition is notoriously complex, understanding the basic structure of the acquisition process provides insight on the key factors to making defense acquisition successful. This video gives an overview of how the acquisition process works, the volume of people, time, and money that goes into making it function, and how this plays out in both simple purchases and complex weapons programs.

Supporting Global Integration: The Joint Staff Approach to Air and Missile Defense
Center for Strategic & International Studies As the United States shifts its focus to the near-peer threat, it must prepare to defend and counter sophisticated air and missile threats. The Joint Staff and the Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) works to coordinate these functions. Within the Department of Defense, JIAMDO is chartered to develop and integrate sensors, weapons, command and control systems, and the concepts to employ them in the air and missile defense mission area. It operates in support of both the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and U.S. Strategic Command. The CSIS Missile Defense Project cordially invites you to two panel discussions featuring current and past JIAMDO leaders, to discuss the organization's history, mission, and future opportunities.

Retrieved from "https://primo.ai/index.php?title=Joint_Capabilities_Integration_and_Development_System_(JCIDS)&oldid=37579"