Difference between revisions of "Best Practices"
m (→Pareto) |
m |
||
| Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
<b>The Heuristics Revolution – Gerd Gigerenzer at Summer Institute 2018 | <b>The Heuristics Revolution – Gerd Gigerenzer at Summer Institute 2018 | ||
</b><br>Decision problems come in two kinds: risk and uncertainty. Risk applies to situations that are well structured and stable, such as gambles, lotteries, and cancer screening, and has been tamed by the probabilistic revolution in the sciences since the beginning of the 17th century. Uncertainty applies to situations that are ill structured and instable, such as human interaction, investment, and business. Although this is an old distinction, most economists and psychologists have ignored it and used the probability theory as the sole tool for dealing with both. Part of the problem was that no theory of decision-making under uncertainty existed until recently. Based on Herbert Simon’s work, we are now developing such a theory of intelligent heuristics that are able to deal with situations of uncertainty. The science of heuristics addresses three questions. The first is descriptive: What are the heuristics in the adaptive toolbox of a species, an organization, or an individual, and how do people choose between heuristics? The second is normative: In which situations is a heuristic better than a complex strategy? This question is known as the study of the ecological rationality of heuristics, which proceeds using analysis and simulation. The third question is one of intuitive design: How can systems be designed that help experts and laypeople make better decisions, be it in developing simple rules for safer financial regulation or improving medical diagnosis? The methodological tools are threefold: formal models of heuristics (instead of vague labels such as “System 1”), competitive testing of heuristics against complex strategies (instead of null hypothesis testing), and tests of the predictive power of heuristics (instead of data fitting). The heuristic revolution complements the probabilistic revolution and overcomes the earlier misconception of heuristics as biases. | </b><br>Decision problems come in two kinds: risk and uncertainty. Risk applies to situations that are well structured and stable, such as gambles, lotteries, and cancer screening, and has been tamed by the probabilistic revolution in the sciences since the beginning of the 17th century. Uncertainty applies to situations that are ill structured and instable, such as human interaction, investment, and business. Although this is an old distinction, most economists and psychologists have ignored it and used the probability theory as the sole tool for dealing with both. Part of the problem was that no theory of decision-making under uncertainty existed until recently. Based on Herbert Simon’s work, we are now developing such a theory of intelligent heuristics that are able to deal with situations of uncertainty. The science of heuristics addresses three questions. The first is descriptive: What are the heuristics in the adaptive toolbox of a species, an organization, or an individual, and how do people choose between heuristics? The second is normative: In which situations is a heuristic better than a complex strategy? This question is known as the study of the ecological rationality of heuristics, which proceeds using analysis and simulation. The third question is one of intuitive design: How can systems be designed that help experts and laypeople make better decisions, be it in developing simple rules for safer financial regulation or improving medical diagnosis? The methodological tools are threefold: formal models of heuristics (instead of vague labels such as “System 1”), competitive testing of heuristics against complex strategies (instead of null hypothesis testing), and tests of the predictive power of heuristics (instead of data fitting). The heuristic revolution complements the probabilistic revolution and overcomes the earlier misconception of heuristics as biases. | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |}<!-- B --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Pareto = | ||
| + | [https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Pareto+Principle+artificial+intelligence+Deep+Machine+Learning+AI YouTube search...] | ||
| + | [https://www.google.com/search?q=Pareto+Principle+artificial+intelligence+Deep+Machine+Learning+AI ...Google search] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle Pareto Principle | Wikipedia] | ||
| + | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_distribution Pareto Distribution | Wikipedia] | ||
| + | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_chart Pareto Chart | Wikipedia] | ||
| + | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_priority_index https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_priority_index Pareto Priority Index | Wikipedia] | ||
| + | * [https://hbr.org/2017/02/ai-is-going-to-change-the-8020-rule AI Is Going to Change the 80/20 Rule | Michael Schrage - Harvard Business Review] | ||
| + | * [https://vigir.missouri.edu/~gdesouza/Research/Conference_CDs/IEEE_SSCI_2007/CI%20and%20Games%20-%20CIG%202007/data/papers/CIG/S002P003.pdf Pareto Evolution and Co-Evolution in Cognitive Neural Agents Synthesis for Tic-Tac-Toe | Y. Yau, J. Teo and P. Anthony] | ||
| + | * [https://www.aaai.org/Papers/JAIR/Vol21/JAIR-2104.pdf Competitive Coevolution through Evolutionary Complexification | Kenneth O. Stanley and Risto Miikkulainen] | ||
| + | * [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0952197601000367 A Pareto-optimal genetic algorithm for warehouse multi-objective optimization | P.N. Poulos, G.G. Rigatos, S.G. Tzafestas, and A.K. Koukos - ScienceDirect] | ||
| + | * [https://www.kdnuggets.com/2019/03/pareto-principle-data-scientists.html The Pareto Principle for Data Scientists | Pradeep Gulipalli - Tiger Analytics KDnuggets] | ||
| + | * [https://medium.com/@mittajithendra46/pareto-distribution-to-normal-distribution-24cf3657a551 Pareto Distribution to Normal Distribution | result of strain - Medium] | ||
| + | * [https://resumelab.com/career-advice/pareto-principle Pareto Principle & the 80/20 Rule (Updated for 2020) | Maciej Duszynski - ResumeLab] | ||
| + | * [https://qctraininginc.com/7-basic-quality-tools-the-pareto-chart/ 7 Quality Tools – The Pareto Chart | Steven Bonacorsi - QC Training Services, Inc.] | ||
| + | * [https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10782 AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularity | S. Udrescu, A. Tan, J. Feng, O. Neto, T. Wu, and M. Tegmark] | ||
| + | |||
| + | If we consider the <b>Pareto Principle</b> when leveraging AI, we would employ human skills such as strategy, creativity, and collaboration for the <b>20 percent of tasks that drive 80 percent of business impact</b>. Then, apply AI to the 80 percent of tasks that are routine-oriented and structured, making them ideal for automation. [https://www.marchex.com/blog/artificial-intelligence-jobs-and-the-pareto-principle/#:~:text=If%20we%20consider%20the%20Pareto,making%20them%20ideal%20for%20automation. Artificial Intelligence, jobs and the Pareto Principle | Erin Murphy - Marchex] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <img src="https://qctraininginc.com/wp-content/uploads/80_20-Rule-Pareto-1024x683.png" width="800"> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {|<!-- T --> | ||
| + | | valign="top" | | ||
| + | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | ||
| + | || | ||
| + | <youtube>AabUVkYsV2s</youtube> | ||
| + | <b>COVID-19 | ||
| + | </b><br>nETSETOS This video describes Pareto Distribution with given topics:- - 80-20 rule with graph - Parameter of Pareto Distribution - Application of Pareto Principle' - COVID - 19 Analysis with Pareto - How to Plot Pareto On [[Jupyter]] - Testing Pareto with the help of QQPlot | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |<!-- M --> | ||
| + | | valign="top" | | ||
| + | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | ||
| + | || | ||
| + | <youtube>pkJkHB_c3nA</youtube> | ||
| + | <b>AI for physics & physics for AI | ||
| + | </b><br>Max Tegmark, MIT | ||
| + | Abstract: After briefly reviewing how machine learning is becoming ever-more widely used in physics, I explore how ideas and methods from physics can help improve machine learning, focusing on automated discovery of mathematical formulas from data. I present a method for unsupervised learning of equations of motion for objects in raw and optionally distorted unlabeled video. I also describe progress on symbolic regression, i.e., finding a symbolic expression that matches data from an unknown function. Although this problem is likely to be NP-hard in general, functions of practical interest often exhibit symmetries, separability, compositionality and other simplifying properties. In this spirit, we have developed a recursive multidimensional symbolic regression algorithm that combines neural network fitting with a suite of physics-inspired techniques that discover and exploit these simplifying properties, enabling significant improvement of state-of-the-art performance. | ||
| + | Related papers: AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regression - https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11481 AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularity - https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10782 Symbolic Pregression: Discovering Physical Laws from Raw Distorted Video - https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11212 | ||
|} | |} | ||
|}<!-- B --> | |}<!-- B --> | ||
Revision as of 04:26, 30 April 2024
YouTube search... ... Quora search ...Google search ...Google News ...Bing News
- Strategy & Tactics ... Project Management ... Best Practices ... Checklists ... Project Check-in ... Evaluation ... Measures
- Leadership
- Risk, Compliance and Regulation ... Ethics ... Privacy ... Law ... AI Governance ... AI Verification and Validation
- Data Science ... Governance ... Preprocessing ... Exploration ... Interoperability ... Master Data Management (MDM) ... Bias and Variances ... Benchmarks ... Datasets
- Rules of Machine Learning: Best Practices for ML Engineering | Martin Zinkevich - Google
- Best practices for performance and cost optimization for machine learning | Google
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Artificial Intelligence Center of Excellence (AI CoE)
- How to Set Up an AI Center of Excellence - Harvard Business Review
- How To Create an Enterprise 'AI Center of Excellence' | Pure AI
- Artificial Intelligence Center of Excellence (AICoE) - WordPress | UD
- Four Steps For Building An AI Center Of Excellence | Forbes
Establishing an AI Center of Excellence is a strategic move that can significantly enhance your organization's AI capabilities. Remember that AI adoption is an ongoing journey. Continuously monitor progress, iterate on your strategy, and adapt to changing technology and business landscapes. By following this plan, your organization can establish a robust AI CoE that drives innovation, efficiency, and value across the board. Here's an outline to guide your organization in adopting AI effectively and maximizing its value:
- Create the AI Vision:
- Define a clear and compelling vision for AI adoption within your organization. Understand how AI aligns with your business goals, mission, and long-term strategy.
- Engage key stakeholders, including executives, business leaders, and technical experts, to ensure buy-in and alignment.
- Identify Use Cases:
- Conduct a thorough assessment of your organization’s processes, pain points, and opportunities.
- Identify specific use cases where AI can add value. Prioritize use cases based on their potential impact, feasibility, and alignment with strategic objectives.
- Determine Ambition Level:
- Define the level of ambition for your AI initiatives. Consider factors such as budget, resources, and risk tolerance.
- Decide whether you want to start with small-scale pilots or aim for broader, organization-wide AI adoption.
- Create a Data Architecture:
- Establish a robust data infrastructure to support AI initiatives.
- Ensure data quality, security, and accessibility. Consider data governance, privacy, and compliance requirements.
- Explore cloud-based solutions for scalability and flexibility.
- Manage External Partnerships:
- Collaborate with external partners, such as AI vendors, research institutions, and industry experts.
- Leverage their expertise, tools, and technologies to accelerate AI development.
- Establish clear communication channels and expectations.
- Identify AI Champions:
- Identify individuals within your organization who are passionate about AI and can drive its adoption.
- These champions can be from various departments—data science, IT, business units, etc.
- Empower them to lead AI initiatives, advocate for AI adoption, and share best practices.
- Share Success Stories:
- Communicate wins and achievements related to AI projects.
- Showcase how AI has improved processes, efficiency, customer experiences, or revenue.
- Use success stories to build momentum and encourage broader adoption.
Heuristics
|
|
|
|
Pareto
YouTube search... ...Google search
- Pareto Principle | Wikipedia
- Pareto Distribution | Wikipedia
- Pareto Chart | Wikipedia
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_priority_index Pareto Priority Index | Wikipedia
- AI Is Going to Change the 80/20 Rule | Michael Schrage - Harvard Business Review
- Pareto Evolution and Co-Evolution in Cognitive Neural Agents Synthesis for Tic-Tac-Toe | Y. Yau, J. Teo and P. Anthony
- Competitive Coevolution through Evolutionary Complexification | Kenneth O. Stanley and Risto Miikkulainen
- A Pareto-optimal genetic algorithm for warehouse multi-objective optimization | P.N. Poulos, G.G. Rigatos, S.G. Tzafestas, and A.K. Koukos - ScienceDirect
- The Pareto Principle for Data Scientists | Pradeep Gulipalli - Tiger Analytics KDnuggets
- Pareto Distribution to Normal Distribution | result of strain - Medium
- Pareto Principle & the 80/20 Rule (Updated for 2020) | Maciej Duszynski - ResumeLab
- 7 Quality Tools – The Pareto Chart | Steven Bonacorsi - QC Training Services, Inc.
- AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularity | S. Udrescu, A. Tan, J. Feng, O. Neto, T. Wu, and M. Tegmark
If we consider the Pareto Principle when leveraging AI, we would employ human skills such as strategy, creativity, and collaboration for the 20 percent of tasks that drive 80 percent of business impact. Then, apply AI to the 80 percent of tasks that are routine-oriented and structured, making them ideal for automation. Artificial Intelligence, jobs and the Pareto Principle | Erin Murphy - Marchex
|
|