Difference between revisions of "Law"
m |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|description=Helpful resources for your journey with artificial intelligence; videos, articles, techniques, courses, profiles, and tools | |description=Helpful resources for your journey with artificial intelligence; videos, articles, techniques, courses, profiles, and tools | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | [ | + | [https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=law+lawyer+artificial+intelligence+deep+learning Youtube search...] |
| − | [ | + | [https://www.google.com/search?q=law+lawyer+deep+machine+learning+ML ...Google search] |
* [[Case Studies]] | * [[Case Studies]] | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* [[Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)#Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)|Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)]] | * [[Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)#Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)|Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)]] | ||
* [[Blockchain]] | * [[Blockchain]] | ||
| − | * [ | + | * [https://www.legalsifter.com/ LegalSifter] |
| − | * [ | + | * [https://premonition.ai/ knowsPremonition] generated the World's largest litigation database, and able to read and analyze over 50,000 documents a second. |
| − | * [ | + | * [https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/12/232890-ai-judges-and-juries/fulltext AI Judges and Juries | Logan Kugler - Communications of the ACM] |
| − | * [ | + | * [https://interestingengineering.com/ai-vs-lawyers-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-and-law AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering] |
| − | * [ | + | * [https://www.bnh.ai/ Bnh.ai] ...a law firm focused on AI ...[https://github.com/bnh-ai/resources Sample AI Incident Response Checklist] |
| − | * [ | + | * [https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/05/could-a-stranger-hijack-your-smart-home Could a stranger hijack your smart home? | Vanity Fair] Perhaps most alarming of all is that hijacking an Amazon Echo does not appear to violate any existing laws. Our antiquated U.S. legal code hasn’t caught up with the likes of smart devices, and it’s legal—though “counter to the public interest,” per the Federal Communications Commission—to broadcast subliminal messages via machine. Subliminal messages may be considered a violation of [[privacy]], but that concept has not been successfully extended in court to machines. At least not yet. |
* [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-powered-robot-lawyer-takes-its-first-court-case/ AI-powered "robot" lawyer will be first of its kind to represent defendant in court | Megan Ceerullo - CBS NEWS] | * [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-powered-robot-lawyer-takes-its-first-court-case/ AI-powered "robot" lawyer will be first of its kind to represent defendant in court | Megan Ceerullo - CBS NEWS] | ||
| Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
</b><br>Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado; Affiliated Faculty, CodeX | </b><br>Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado; Affiliated Faculty, CodeX | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | + | https://inteng-storage.s3.amazonaws.com/images/sizes/AccuracyAIlaw-1_resize_md.jpg | |
= <span id="Artificial Intelligence Law"></span>Artificial Intelligence Law = | = <span id="Artificial Intelligence Law"></span>Artificial Intelligence Law = | ||
| − | [ | + | [https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Artificial+Intelligence+Law YouTube search...] |
| − | [ | + | [https://www.google.com/search?q=Artificial+Intelligence+Law ...Google search] |
* [[What is AI?]] | * [[What is AI?]] | ||
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
________________________________________ | ________________________________________ | ||
| − | * [ | + | * [https://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA00/20180314/107997/HHRG-115-FA00-Transcript-20180314.pdf Modernizing Export Controls: Protecting Cutting-Edge Technology and U.S. National Security, March 14, 2018 | Committee on Foreign Affairs - US House of Representatives] |
| − | * [ | + | * [https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0770.pdf EXPORT CONTROLS Agencies Should Assess Vulnerabilities and Improve Guidance for Protecting Export- Controlled Information at Universities, 2006 | U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)] |
| − | * The Arms Export Control Act (AECA) is the cornerstone of U.S. munitions export control law; implementation through [ | + | * The Arms Export Control Act (AECA) is the cornerstone of U.S. munitions export control law; implementation through [https://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a312382.pdf International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) June 1996 / United States Munitions List (USML) | U.S. State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)] |
| − | * The Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, authorizes the Department of Commerce, in consultation with other appropriate agencies, to regulate the export or re-export of U.S.-origin dual-use goods, software, and technology. [ | + | * The Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, authorizes the Department of Commerce, in consultation with other appropriate agencies, to regulate the export or re-export of U.S.-origin dual-use goods, software, and technology. [https://classic.ntis.gov/products/export-regs/ Export Administration Regulations (EAR)/Commerce Control List (CCL)| U.S. Department of Commerce] |
{|<!-- T --> | {|<!-- T --> | ||
| Line 218: | Line 218: | ||
== <span id="IntellectualPropertyOwnership"></span>Intellectual Property (IP) Ownership == | == <span id="IntellectualPropertyOwnership"></span>Intellectual Property (IP) Ownership == | ||
| − | ...recent artificial intelligence case, in which the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that an AI system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. Unlike US patent law, US copyright law does not have an express requirement of human authorship; however, US courts and the US Copyright Office generally operate on the basis of this requirement and deny registrations of works not created by humans. In fact, the Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices—a manual produced by the US Copyright Office, intended for use primarily by the Copyright Office staff as a general guide to policies and procedures such as registration, deposit and recordation—states, “the term ‘authorship’ implies that, for a work to be copyrightable, it must owe its origin to a human being”. Materials produced solely by nature, by plants, or by animals are not copyrightable. The metaverse could have virtual creations by avatars and AI aspects built into them. If such creations are deemed to be AI creations and not human creations, they may not be allowed certain types of intellectual property protection. [ | + | ...recent artificial intelligence case, in which the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that an AI system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. Unlike US patent law, US copyright law does not have an express requirement of human authorship; however, US courts and the US Copyright Office generally operate on the basis of this requirement and deny registrations of works not created by humans. In fact, the Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices—a manual produced by the US Copyright Office, intended for use primarily by the Copyright Office staff as a general guide to policies and procedures such as registration, deposit and recordation—states, “the term ‘authorship’ implies that, for a work to be copyrightable, it must owe its origin to a human being”. Materials produced solely by nature, by plants, or by animals are not copyrightable. The metaverse could have virtual creations by avatars and AI aspects built into them. If such creations are deemed to be AI creations and not human creations, they may not be allowed certain types of intellectual property protection. [https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/a-brief-overview-of-the-metaverse-and-9541020/ A Brief Overview of the Metaverse and the Legal Challenges It Will Present | Rahul Kapoor & Shokoh Yaghoubi - JDSUPRA] |
Revision as of 23:29, 15 January 2023
Youtube search... ...Google search
- Case Studies
- Other Challenges in Artificial Intelligence
- Explainable / Interpretable AI
- Bias and Variances
- Privacy
- Ethics
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)
- Blockchain
- LegalSifter
- knowsPremonition generated the World's largest litigation database, and able to read and analyze over 50,000 documents a second.
- AI Judges and Juries | Logan Kugler - Communications of the ACM
- AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering
- Bnh.ai ...a law firm focused on AI ...Sample AI Incident Response Checklist
- Could a stranger hijack your smart home? | Vanity Fair Perhaps most alarming of all is that hijacking an Amazon Echo does not appear to violate any existing laws. Our antiquated U.S. legal code hasn’t caught up with the likes of smart devices, and it’s legal—though “counter to the public interest,” per the Federal Communications Commission—to broadcast subliminal messages via machine. Subliminal messages may be considered a violation of privacy, but that concept has not been successfully extended in court to machines. At least not yet.
- AI-powered "robot" lawyer will be first of its kind to represent defendant in court | Megan Ceerullo - CBS NEWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contents
Extracting Legal Data
|
|
Contracts
|
|
Blockchain, AI and Law
|
|
Artificial Intelligence and Law – An Overview and History
Artificial Intelligence LawYouTube search... ...Google search Having a usable definition of AI – and soon – is vital for regulation and governance because laws and policies simply will not operate without one. This definition problem crops up in all regulatory contexts, from ensuring truthful use of the term “AI” in product advertising right through to establishing how next-generation automated weapons systems (AWSs) are treated under the laws of war. ________________________________________
Intellectual Property (IP) Ownership...recent artificial intelligence case, in which the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that an AI system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. Unlike US patent law, US copyright law does not have an express requirement of human authorship; however, US courts and the US Copyright Office generally operate on the basis of this requirement and deny registrations of works not created by humans. In fact, the Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices—a manual produced by the US Copyright Office, intended for use primarily by the Copyright Office staff as a general guide to policies and procedures such as registration, deposit and recordation—states, “the term ‘authorship’ implies that, for a work to be copyrightable, it must owe its origin to a human being”. Materials produced solely by nature, by plants, or by animals are not copyrightable. The metaverse could have virtual creations by avatars and AI aspects built into them. If such creations are deemed to be AI creations and not human creations, they may not be allowed certain types of intellectual property protection. A Brief Overview of the Metaverse and the Legal Challenges It Will Present | Rahul Kapoor & Shokoh Yaghoubi - JDSUPRA |