Difference between revisions of "Law Enforcement"
m |
m |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|title=PRIMO.ai | |title=PRIMO.ai | ||
|titlemode=append | |titlemode=append | ||
− | |keywords=artificial, intelligence, machine, learning, models | + | |keywords=ChatGPT, artificial, intelligence, machine, learning, GPT-4, GPT-5, NLP, NLG, NLC, NLU, models, data, singularity, moonshot, Sentience, AGI, Emergence, Moonshot, Explainable, TensorFlow, Google, Nvidia, Microsoft, Azure, Amazon, AWS, Hugging Face, OpenAI, Tensorflow, OpenAI, Google, Nvidia, Microsoft, Azure, Amazon, AWS, Meta, LLM, metaverse, assistants, agents, digital twin, IoT, Transhumanism, Immersive Reality, Generative AI, Conversational AI, Perplexity, Bing, You, Bard, Ernie, prompt Engineering LangChain, Video/Image, Vision, End-to-End Speech, Synthesize Speech, Speech Recognition, Stanford, MIT |description=Helpful resources for your journey with artificial intelligence; videos, articles, techniques, courses, profiles, and tools |
− | |description=Helpful resources for your journey with artificial intelligence; videos, articles, techniques, courses, profiles, and tools | + | |
+ | <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> | ||
+ | <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-4GCWLBVJ7T"></script> | ||
+ | <script> | ||
+ | window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; | ||
+ | function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} | ||
+ | gtag('js', new Date()); | ||
+ | |||
+ | gtag('config', 'G-4GCWLBVJ7T'); | ||
+ | </script> | ||
}} | }} | ||
[https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=~solve+~crime+Law+Enforcement+~police+criminal+justice+human+trafficking+drone+Fighting+Robot+artificial+intelligence+ai Youtube search...] | [https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=~solve+~crime+Law+Enforcement+~police+criminal+justice+human+trafficking+drone+Fighting+Robot+artificial+intelligence+ai Youtube search...] | ||
[https://www.google.com/search?q=~solve+~crime+Law+Enforcement+~police+criminal+justice+human+trafficking+drone+Fighting+Robot+artificial+intelligence+ai ...Google search] | [https://www.google.com/search?q=~solve+~crime+Law+Enforcement+~police+criminal+justice+human+trafficking+drone+Fighting+Robot+artificial+intelligence+ai ...Google search] | ||
− | * [[ | + | * [[Cybersecurity]] ... [[Open-Source Intelligence - OSINT |OSINT]] ... [[Cybersecurity Frameworks, Architectures & Roadmaps | Frameworks]] ... [[Cybersecurity References|References]] ... [[Offense - Adversarial Threats/Attacks| Offense]] ... [[National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)|NIST]] ... [[U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)| DHS]] ... [[Screening; Passenger, Luggage, & Cargo|Screening]] ... [[Law Enforcement]] ... [[Government Services|Government]] ... [[Defense]] ... [[Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)#Cybersecurity & Acquisition Lifecycle Integration| Lifecycle Integration]] ... [[Cybersecurity Companies/Products|Products]] ... [[Cybersecurity: Evaluating & Selling|Evaluating]] |
− | ** [[ | + | * [[Law]] |
− | * | + | * [[Agents]] ... [[Robotic Process Automation (RPA)|Robotic Process Automation]] ... [[Assistants]] ... [[Personal Companions]] ... [[Personal Productivity|Productivity]] ... [[Email]] ... [[Negotiation]] ... [[LangChain]] |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Risk, Compliance and Regulation]] ... [[Ethics]] ... [[Privacy]] ... [[Law]] ... [[AI Governance]] ... [[AI Verification and Validation]] |
+ | * [[Policy]] ... [[Policy vs Plan]] ... [[Constitutional AI]] ... [[Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO)]] ... [[Policy Gradient (PG)]] ... [[Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)]] | ||
* [https://www.pcgamer.com/man-defends-against-package-thieves-using-machine-learning-ai-flour-and-very-loud-sirens/ Man defends against package thieves using machine learning AI, flour, and very loud sirens | Jorge Jimenez - PC Gamer] | * [https://www.pcgamer.com/man-defends-against-package-thieves-using-machine-learning-ai-flour-and-very-loud-sirens/ Man defends against package thieves using machine learning AI, flour, and very loud sirens | Jorge Jimenez - PC Gamer] | ||
Line 35: | Line 45: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | ||
|| | || | ||
− | <youtube> | + | <youtube>SWGdrIrN-K4</youtube> |
− | <b> | + | <b>International Policing, Ethics, & the Use of AI in Law Enforcement, with Interpol's Jürgen Stock |
− | </b><br> | + | </b><br>In this episode of the Artificial Intelligence & Equality podcast, Senior Fellow Anja Kaspersen speaks with Dr. Jürgen Stock, secretary general of the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol). In an engaging conversation, they discuss his professional journey towards leading the world police body, what keeps him up at night, and the critical role of global police work in keeping societies safe, especially as those seeking to evade justice increasingly hide behind screens, and operate via bits and bytes, as well as on the dark net. |
|} | |} | ||
|}<!-- B --> | |}<!-- B --> | ||
Line 46: | Line 56: | ||
<youtube>RDkYyb15KiE</youtube> | <youtube>RDkYyb15KiE</youtube> | ||
<b>Using Artificial Intelligence to Fight Human Trafficking | Emily Kennedy | TEDxPittsburgh | <b>Using Artificial Intelligence to Fight Human Trafficking | Emily Kennedy | TEDxPittsburgh | ||
− | </b><br>The horrors of human trafficking are widespread across the world. Big problems require top technology and ingenuity, that's where the idea of creating Artificial Intelligence powered software for law enforcement comes in. Technologist and founder Emily Kennedy's idea for fighting the spread of human trafficking centers on the heart of the mission and the technology created to find and rescue victims while bringing criminals to justice. Emily Kennedy is a startup founder, human trafficking subject matter expert, Forbes 30 Under 30, a Mother of Invention, keynote speaker, and activist. She has been developing technology solutions to human trafficking since 2011 at the Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Institute. Her company Marinus Analytics uses the latest advancements in AI to turn big data into actionable intelligence for sex trafficking investigations. As President and Co-Founder of Marinus Analytics, she leads development and deployment of these tools to law enforcement across the globe for use on criminal cases, with an emphasis on sex trafficking investigations. She routinely works alongside, advises, and teaches stakeholders—such as attorneys general, prosecutors, law enforcement agents, and non-profit victim services organizations—on micro and macro approaches to combating and measuring human trafficking in the United States and abroad. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx | + | </b><br>The horrors of human trafficking are widespread across the world. Big problems require top technology and ingenuity, that's where the idea of creating Artificial Intelligence powered software for law enforcement comes in. Technologist and founder Emily Kennedy's idea for fighting the spread of human trafficking centers on the heart of the mission and the technology created to find and rescue victims while bringing criminals to justice. Emily Kennedy is a startup founder, human trafficking subject matter expert, Forbes 30 Under 30, a Mother of Invention, keynote speaker, and activist. She has been developing technology solutions to human trafficking since 2011 at the Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Institute. Her company Marinus Analytics uses the latest advancements in AI to turn big data into actionable intelligence for sex trafficking investigations. As President and Co-Founder of Marinus Analytics, she leads [[development]] and deployment of these tools to law enforcement across the globe for use on criminal cases, with an emphasis on sex trafficking investigations. She routinely works alongside, advises, and teaches stakeholders—such as attorneys general, prosecutors, law enforcement agents, and non-profit victim services organizations—on micro and macro approaches to combating and measuring human trafficking in the United States and abroad. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx |
|} | |} | ||
|<!-- M --> | |<!-- M --> | ||
Line 79: | Line 89: | ||
|| | || | ||
<youtube>p-82YeUPQh0</youtube> | <youtube>p-82YeUPQh0</youtube> | ||
− | <b>The danger of predictive algorithms in criminal justice | Hany Farid | TEDxAmoskeagMillyard | + | <b>The danger of [[Predictive Analytics|predictive algorithms]] in criminal justice | Hany Farid | TEDxAmoskeagMillyard |
− | </b><br>Predictive algorithms may help us shop, discover new music or literature, but do they belong in the courthouse? Dartmouth professor Dr. Hany Farid reverse engineers the inherent dangers and potential biases of recommendations engines built to mete out justice in today's criminal justice system. The co-founder and CTO of Fourandsix Technologies, an image authentication and forensics company, Hany Farid works to advance the field of digital forensics. Hany said, “For the past decade I have been working on technology and policy that will find a balance between an open and free Internet while reining in online abuses. With approximately a billion [[Meta|Facebook]] uploads per day and 400 hours of video uploaded to YouTube every minute, this task is technically and logistically complicated but also, I believe, critical to the long-term health of our online communities.” Hany is the Albert Bradley 1915 Third Century Professor and Chair of Computer Science at Dartmouth. He is also a Senior Adviser to the Counter Extremism Project. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx | + | </b><br>[[Predictive Analytics|Predictive algorithms]] may help us shop, discover new music or literature, but do they belong in the courthouse? Dartmouth professor Dr. Hany Farid reverse engineers the inherent dangers and potential biases of recommendations engines built to mete out justice in today's criminal justice system. The co-founder and CTO of Fourandsix Technologies, an image authentication and forensics company, Hany Farid works to advance the field of digital forensics. Hany said, “For the past decade I have been working on technology and [[policy]] that will find a balance between an open and free Internet while reining in online abuses. With approximately a billion [[Meta|Facebook]] uploads per day and 400 hours of video uploaded to YouTube every minute, this task is technically and logistically complicated but also, I believe, critical to the long-term health of our online communities.” Hany is the Albert Bradley 1915 Third Century Professor and Chair of Computer Science at Dartmouth. He is also a Senior Adviser to the Counter Extremism Project. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx |
|} | |} | ||
|<!-- M --> | |<!-- M --> | ||
Line 97: | Line 107: | ||
<youtube>V6hx5OvDIuw</youtube> | <youtube>V6hx5OvDIuw</youtube> | ||
<b>Reshaping the Future of Crime, Terrorism and Security - Artificial Intelligence and Robotics | <b>Reshaping the Future of Crime, Terrorism and Security - Artificial Intelligence and Robotics | ||
− | </b><br>Recent technological advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics have moved these technologies away from the realm of science fiction and into our daily lives. The massive growth in computational power and increasing abundance of data have vastly improved the capabilities of AI and robotics, giving them more real-world applications. In light of this, stakeholders in both the public and private sector have begun to pursue these technologies with a view to revolutionizing fields such as healthcare, transportation, agriculture and the financial and legal systems, by enhancing efficiency, optimizing resource allocation, reducing costs and creating new revenue opportunities. The technological advances taking place in the fields of AI and robotics can also have many positive effects for law enforcement and security agencies, for instance in terms of identifying persons of interest, stolen vehicles or suspicious sounds and behavior; predicting trends in criminality or terrorist action; tracking illicit money flows; flagging and responding to terrorist use of the internet, and even contributing to international cooperation by supporting the research, analysis and response to international mutual assistance requests from the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). At the same time however, these technologies are only as good as the user that employs them. In the hands of criminals or terrorist organizations such dual-use technologies could equally enable new digital, physical or even political threats. The event will seek to build upon the success of the UNICRI-INTERPOL meeting in Singapore by further raising awareness of the risks and benefits of AI and robotics for a crime, terrorism and security perspective and contributing to fostering a coordinated international movement on the issue. Key challenges, findings and recommendations identified during the UNICRI-INTERPOL meeting will also be spotlight and copies of the forthcoming meeting report will be distributed. The event organized by UNICRI and INTERPOL, with the support of the Permanent Missions of Georgia, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Arab Emirates will have two substantive panels: Panel I – “The Future, Today” Panel II – “Facing the Challenges Together” | + | </b><br>Recent technological advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics have moved these technologies away from the realm of science fiction and into our daily lives. The massive growth in computational power and increasing abundance of data have vastly improved the capabilities of AI and robotics, giving them more real-world applications. In light of this, stakeholders in both the public and private sector have begun to pursue these technologies with a view to revolutionizing fields such as healthcare, transportation, agriculture and the financial and legal systems, by enhancing efficiency, optimizing resource allocation, reducing costs and creating new revenue opportunities. The technological advances taking place in the fields of AI and robotics can also have many positive effects for law enforcement and security agencies, for instance in terms of identifying persons of interest, stolen vehicles or suspicious sounds and behavior; predicting trends in criminality or terrorist action; tracking illicit money flows; flagging and responding to terrorist use of the internet, and even contributing to international cooperation by supporting the research, analysis and response to international mutual assistance requests from the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). At the same time however, these technologies are only as good as the user that employs them. In the hands of criminals or terrorist organizations such dual-use technologies could equally enable new digital, physical or even political threats. The event will seek to build upon the success of the UNICRI-INTERPOL meeting in Singapore by further raising awareness of the risks and benefits of AI and robotics for a crime, terrorism and security [[perspective]] and contributing to fostering a coordinated international movement on the issue. Key challenges, findings and recommendations identified during the UNICRI-INTERPOL meeting will also be spotlight and copies of the forthcoming meeting report will be distributed. The event organized by UNICRI and INTERPOL, with the support of the Permanent Missions of Georgia, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Arab Emirates will have two substantive panels: Panel I – “The Future, Today” Panel II – “Facing the Challenges Together” |
|} | |} | ||
|<!-- M --> | |<!-- M --> | ||
Line 115: | Line 125: | ||
<b>CPDP 2020: Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice? | <b>CPDP 2020: Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice? | ||
</b><br>MODERATOR: Juraj Sajfert | </b><br>MODERATOR: Juraj Sajfert | ||
− | SPEAKERS: Katalin Ligeti, University of Luxembourg (LU); Anna Moscibroda, DG JUST (EU); Lani Cossette, Microsoft (BE); Frank Schuermans, Supervisory Body for Police Information (BE) Panel Description AI can make predictions about where, when, and by whom crimes are likely to be committed. AI can also estimate how likely it is that a suspect, defendant or convict flees or commits further crimes. Against the backdrop that AI helps predictive policing and predictive justice, what should the EU’s legal and policy responses be, in particular after the adoption of the Artificial Intelligence Ethics Guidelines? One approach is to count on the vitality of recently adopted data protection laws -in particular, Law Enforcement Directive (EU) 2016/680. Another approach would be to launch a regulatory reform process, either in or out of the classical data protection realm. This panel will look at the usefulness and reliability of AI for criminal justice and will critically asses the different regulatory avenues the new European Commission might consider. - How does the idea of “trustworthy AI” translate into the area of criminal law? - Should we not ban the use of predictive policing systems or the use of AI in criminal law cases, on the basis of ethics? - Does the new European Commission plan to propose legislation in this area? If yes, what would be the objectives of such new laws? Should the actors leading such a reform be different from the ones that were leading the EU data protection reform? - Is it possible to develop predictive justice and predictive policing, and still respect the requirements of the GDPR and Directive (EU) 2016/680? | + | SPEAKERS: Katalin Ligeti, University of Luxembourg (LU); Anna Moscibroda, DG JUST (EU); Lani Cossette, Microsoft (BE); Frank Schuermans, Supervisory Body for Police Information (BE) Panel Description AI can make predictions about where, when, and by whom crimes are likely to be committed. AI can also estimate how likely it is that a suspect, defendant or convict flees or commits further crimes. Against the backdrop that AI helps predictive policing and predictive justice, what should the EU’s legal and [[policy]] responses be, in particular after the adoption of the Artificial Intelligence Ethics Guidelines? One approach is to count on the vitality of recently adopted data protection laws -in particular, Law Enforcement Directive (EU) 2016/680. Another approach would be to launch a regulatory reform process, either in or out of the classical data protection realm. This panel will look at the usefulness and reliability of AI for criminal justice and will critically asses the different regulatory avenues the new European Commission might consider. - How does the idea of “trustworthy AI” translate into the area of criminal law? - Should we not ban the use of predictive policing systems or the use of AI in criminal law cases, on the basis of ethics? - Does the new European Commission plan to propose legislation in this area? If yes, what would be the objectives of such new laws? Should the actors leading such a reform be different from the ones that were leading the EU data protection reform? - Is it possible to develop predictive justice and predictive policing, and still respect the requirements of the GDPR and Directive (EU) 2016/680? |
|} | |} | ||
|<!-- M --> | |<!-- M --> |
Latest revision as of 16:03, 28 April 2024
Youtube search... ...Google search
- Cybersecurity ... OSINT ... Frameworks ... References ... Offense ... NIST ... DHS ... Screening ... Law Enforcement ... Government ... Defense ... Lifecycle Integration ... Products ... Evaluating
- Law
- Agents ... Robotic Process Automation ... Assistants ... Personal Companions ... Productivity ... Email ... Negotiation ... LangChain
- Risk, Compliance and Regulation ... Ethics ... Privacy ... Law ... AI Governance ... AI Verification and Validation
- Policy ... Policy vs Plan ... Constitutional AI ... Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) ... Policy Gradient (PG) ... Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)
- Man defends against package thieves using machine learning AI, flour, and very loud sirens | Jorge Jimenez - PC Gamer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|