Difference between revisions of "Ethics"
m |
m |
||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | ||
|| | || | ||
| − | <youtube> | + | <youtube>WxcpQW3afkw</youtube> |
| − | <b>Ethics | + | <b>Yi Zeng on "Brain-inspired Artificial Intelligence and Ethics of Artificial Intelligence" |
| − | </b><br> | + | </b><br>Yi Zeng of the Institute of Automation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences on "Brain-inspired Artificial Intelligence and Ethics of Artificial Intelligence" at a LASER/LAst Dialogues www.scaruffi.com/leonardo/sep2020.html |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | - | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|} | |} | ||
|}<!-- B --> | |}<!-- B --> | ||
| Line 97: | Line 81: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | ||
|| | || | ||
| − | <youtube> | + | <youtube>_zwBCDmlvv8</youtube> |
| − | <b> | + | <b>Ethics and Bias in Artificial Intelligence - 18th Vienna Deep Learning Meetup |
| − | </b><br> | + | </b><br>The Vienna Deep Learning Meetup and the Centre for Informatics and Society of TU Wien jointly organized an evening of discussion on the topic of Ethics and Bias in AI. As promising as machine learning techniques are in terms of their potential to do good, the technologies raise a number of ethical questions and are prone to biases that can subvert their well-intentioned goals. |
| + | Machine learning systems, from simple spam filtering or recommender systems to Deep Learning and AI, have already arrived at many different parts of society. Which web search results, job offers, product ads and social media posts we see online, even what we pay for food, mobility or insurance - all these decisions are already being made or supported by algorithms, many of which rely on statistical and machine learning methods. As they permeate society more and more, we also discover the real world impact of these systems due to inherent biases they carry. For instance, criminal risk scoring to determine bail for defendants in US district courts has been found to be biased against black people, and analysis of word embeddings has been shown to reaffirm gender stereotypes due to biased training data. While a general consensus seems to exist that such biases are almost inevitable, solutions range from embracing the bias as a factual representation of an unfair society to mathematical approaches trying to determine and combat bias in machine learning training data and the resulting algorithms. Besides producing biased results, many machine learning methods and applications raise complex ethical questions. Should governments use such methods to determine the trustworthiness of their citizens? Should the use of systems known to have biases be tolerated to benefit some while disadvantaging others? Is it ethical to develop AI technologies that might soon replace many jobs currently performed by humans? And how do we keep AI and automation technologies from widening society's divides, such as the digital divide or income inequality? This event provides a platform for multidisciplinary debate in the form of keynotes and a panel discussion with international experts from diverse fields: Keynotes: - Prof. Moshe Vardi: "Deep Learning and the Crisis of Trust in Computing" - Prof. Sarah Spiekermann-Hoff: “The Big Data Illusion and its Impact on Flourishing with General AI” Panelists: Ethics and Bias in AI - Prof. Moshe Vardi, Karen Ostrum George Distinguished Service Professor in Computational Engineering, Rice University - Prof. Peter Purgathofer, Centre for Informatics and Society / Institute for Visual Computing & Human-Centered Technology, TU Wien - Prof. Sarah Spiekermann-Hoff, Institute for Management Information Systems, WU Vienna - Prof. Mark Coeckelbergh, Professor of Philosophy of Media and Technology, Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna - Dr. Christof Tschohl, Scientific Director at Research Institute AG & Co KG Moderator: Markus Mooslechner, Terra Mater Factual Studios | ||
|} | |} | ||
|}<!-- B --> | |}<!-- B --> | ||
Revision as of 17:10, 8 October 2020
YouTube search... ...Google search
- Case Studies
- Risk, Compliance and Regulation
- Government Services
- Defense
- Responsible AI Champions Pilot | Department of Defense Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) ...DoD AI Principles ...Themes ...Tactics
- Other Challenges in Artificial Intelligence
- Explainable / Interpretable AI
- Bias and Variances
- Privacy
- Law
- Amazon joins Microsoft in calling for regulation of facial recognition tech | Saqib Shah - engadget
- The Internet needs new rules. Let’s start in these four areas. | Mark Zuckerberg
- How Big Tech funds the debate on AI ethics | Oscar Williams - NewStatesman and NS Tech
- Europe is making AI rules now to avoid a new tech crisis | Ivana Kottasová - CNN Business
- OECD members, including U.S., back guiding principles to make AI safer | Leigh Thomas - Reuters
- 3 Practical Solutions to Offset Automation’s Impact on Work | Moran Cerf, Ryan Burke and Scott Payne - Singularity Hub
- EU backs AI regulation while China and US favour technology | Siddharth Venkataramakrishnan - The Financial Times Limited
- Could tough new rules to regulate big tech backfire? | Harry de Quetteville & Matthew Field - The Telegraph
- Don’t let industry write the rules for AI | Yochai Benkler - Nature
- The Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2019: Taking the Right Steps Toward AI Success | Colin Priest - DataRobot
Leading institutes and companies have published a set of ethical standards for AI research Europe is making AI rules now to avoid a new tech crisis
|
|
|
|
|
|