Difference between revisions of "Constitutional AI"
m |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|title=PRIMO.ai | |title=PRIMO.ai | ||
|titlemode=append | |titlemode=append | ||
| − | |keywords=artificial, intelligence, machine, learning, models | + | |keywords=ChatGPT, artificial, intelligence, machine, learning, GPT-4, GPT-5, NLP, NLG, NLC, NLU, models, data, singularity, moonshot, Sentience, AGI, Emergence, Moonshot, Explainable, TensorFlow, Google, Nvidia, Microsoft, Azure, Amazon, AWS, Hugging Face, OpenAI, Tensorflow, OpenAI, Google, Nvidia, Microsoft, Azure, Amazon, AWS, Meta, LLM, metaverse, assistants, agents, digital twin, IoT, Transhumanism, Immersive Reality, Generative AI, Conversational AI, Perplexity, Bing, You, Bard, Ernie, prompt Engineering LangChain, Video/Image, Vision, End-to-End Speech, Synthesize Speech, Speech Recognition, Stanford, MIT |description=Helpful resources for your journey with artificial intelligence; videos, articles, techniques, courses, profiles, and tools |
| − | |description=Helpful resources for your journey with artificial intelligence; videos, articles, techniques, courses, profiles, and tools | + | |
| + | <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> | ||
| + | <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-4GCWLBVJ7T"></script> | ||
| + | <script> | ||
| + | window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; | ||
| + | function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} | ||
| + | gtag('js', new Date()); | ||
| + | |||
| + | gtag('config', 'G-4GCWLBVJ7T'); | ||
| + | </script> | ||
}} | }} | ||
[https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Constitutional+AI YouTube] | [https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Constitutional+AI YouTube] | ||
| Line 11: | Line 20: | ||
[https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=Constitutional+AI&qft=interval%3d%228%22 ...Bing News] | [https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=Constitutional+AI&qft=interval%3d%228%22 ...Bing News] | ||
| + | * [[Policy]] ... [[Policy vs Plan]] ... [[Constitutional AI]] ... [[Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO)]] ... [[Policy Gradient (PG)]] ... [[Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)]] | ||
* [[Reinforcement Learning (RL)]] | * [[Reinforcement Learning (RL)]] | ||
* [[Assistants]] ... [[Personal Companions]] ... [[Agents]] ... [[Negotiation]] ... [[LangChain]] | * [[Assistants]] ... [[Personal Companions]] ... [[Agents]] ... [[Negotiation]] ... [[LangChain]] | ||
| Line 16: | Line 26: | ||
* [[Claude]] | [https://www.anthropic.com/ Anthropic] | * [[Claude]] | [https://www.anthropic.com/ Anthropic] | ||
* [[Reinforcement Learning (RL) from Human Feedback (RLHF)]] | * [[Reinforcement Learning (RL) from Human Feedback (RLHF)]] | ||
| − | |||
* [https://medium.com/mlearning-ai/paper-review-constituional-ai-training-llms-using-principles-16c68cfffaef Paper Review: Constitutional AI, Training LLMs using Principles] | * [https://medium.com/mlearning-ai/paper-review-constituional-ai-training-llms-using-principles-16c68cfffaef Paper Review: Constitutional AI, Training LLMs using Principles] | ||
Revision as of 11:45, 30 June 2023
YouTube ... Quora ...Google search ...Google News ...Bing News
- Policy ... Policy vs Plan ... Constitutional AI ... Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) ... Policy Gradient (PG) ... Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)
- Reinforcement Learning (RL)
- Assistants ... Personal Companions ... Agents ... Negotiation ... LangChain
- Generative AI ... Conversational AI ... OpenAI's ChatGPT ... Perplexity ... Microsoft's Bing ... You ...Google's Bard ... Baidu's Ernie
- Claude | Anthropic
- Reinforcement Learning (RL) from Human Feedback (RLHF)
- Paper Review: Constitutional AI, Training LLMs using Principles
Constitutional AI is a method for training AI systems using a set of rules or principles that act as a “constitution” for the AI system. This approach allows the AI system to operate within a societally accepted framework and aligns it with human intentions1.
Some benefits of using Constitutional AI include allowing a model to explain why it is refusing to provide an answer, improving transparency of AI decision making, and controlling AI behavior more precisely with fewer human labels.
RL from AI Feedback' (RLAIF)
It is a process that involves training a preference model from a dataset of AI preferences and then using that preference model as the reward signal for training with reinforcement learning. RLAIF is a method for training a harmless AI assistant through self-improvement, without any human labels identifying harmful outputs. The only human oversight is provided through a list of rules or principles, and so the method is referred to as ‘Constitutional AI’. The process involves both a supervised learning and a reinforcement learning phase. In the supervised phase, an initial model is sampled from, then self-critiques and revisions are generated, and then the original model is finetuned on revised responses. In the RL phase, samples are taken from the finetuned model and a model is used to evaluate which of the two samples is better. A preference model is then trained from this dataset of AI preferences. The preference model is used as the reward signal for training with RL.
