Difference between revisions of "Benchmarks"
m |
m |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[http://www.google.com/search?q=~Benchmark+Benchmarking+machine+learning+Model ...Google search] | [http://www.google.com/search?q=~Benchmark+Benchmarking+machine+learning+Model ...Google search] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Case Studies]] | ||
| + | ** [[Gaming]] | ||
* [[Evaluation]] | * [[Evaluation]] | ||
** [[Evaluation - Measures]] | ** [[Evaluation - Measures]] | ||
| Line 17: | Line 20: | ||
** [[Train, Validate, and Test]] | ** [[Train, Validate, and Test]] | ||
** [[Model Monitoring]] | ** [[Model Monitoring]] | ||
| − | * [[Datasets]] | + | * [[AI Governance]] |
| − | * [[ | + | ** [[Data Governance]] |
| − | ** [[ | + | *** [[Data Science]] |
| + | *** [[Master Data Management (MDM) / Feature Store / Data Lineage / Data Catalog]] | ||
| + | *** [[Natural Language Processing (NLP)#Managed Vocabularies |Managed Vocabularies]] | ||
| + | *** [[Datasets]] | ||
| + | *** [[Batch Norm(alization) & Standardization]] | ||
| + | *** [[Data Preprocessing]] | ||
| + | *** [[Feature Exploration/Learning]] | ||
| + | *** [[Data Augmentation]], Data Labeling, and Auto-Tagging | ||
* [http://www.aitrends.com/ai-insider/machine-learning-benchmarks-and-ai-self-driving-cars/ Machine Learning Benchmarks and AI Self-Driving Cars | Lance Eliot - AItrends] | * [http://www.aitrends.com/ai-insider/machine-learning-benchmarks-and-ai-self-driving-cars/ Machine Learning Benchmarks and AI Self-Driving Cars | Lance Eliot - AItrends] | ||
* [http://towardsdatascience.com/benchmarking-simple-machine-learning-models-with-feature-extraction-against-modern-black-box-80af734b31cc Benchmarking simple models with feature extraction against modern black-box methods | Martin Dittgen - Towards Data Science] | * [http://towardsdatascience.com/benchmarking-simple-machine-learning-models-with-feature-extraction-against-modern-black-box-80af734b31cc Benchmarking simple models with feature extraction against modern black-box methods | Martin Dittgen - Towards Data Science] | ||
Revision as of 13:52, 7 September 2020
YouTube search... ...Google search
- Case Studies
- Evaluation
- AI Governance
- Machine Learning Benchmarks and AI Self-Driving Cars | Lance Eliot - AItrends
- Benchmarking simple models with feature extraction against modern black-box methods | Martin Dittgen - Towards Data Science
- DAWNBench | Stanford - an End-to-End Deep Learning Benchmark and Competition
- Benchmarking 20 Machine Learning Models Accuracy and Speed | Marc Borowczak - Data Science Central
- Benchmarking deep learning models on large healthcare datasets | S. Purushotham, C. Meng, Z. Chea, and Y. Liu
|
|
|
|
Contents
General Language Understanding Evaluation (GLUE)
The General Language Understanding Evaluation (GLUE) benchmark is a collection of resources for training, evaluating, and analyzing natural language understanding systems... like picking out the names of people and organizations in a sentence and figuring out what a pronoun like “it” refers to when there are multiple potential antecedents. GLUE consists of: A benchmark of nine sentence- or sentence-pair language understanding tasks built on established existing datasets and selected to cover a diverse range of dataset sizes, text genres, and degrees of difficulty, A diagnostic dataset designed to evaluate and analyze model performance with respect to a wide range of linguistic phenomena found in natural language, and A public leaderboard for tracking performance on the benchmark and a dashboard for visualizing the performance of models on the diagnostic set.
|
The Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD)
|
|
MLPerf
- MLPerf benchmarks for measuring training and inference performance of ML hardware, software, and services.
|
|
|
|
Procgen
- OpenAI
- OpenAI’s Procgen Benchmark prevents AI model overfitting | Kyle Wiggers - VentureBeat a set of 16 procedurally generated environments that measure how quickly a model learns generalizable skills. It builds atop the startup’s CoinRun toolset, which used procedural generation to construct sets of training and test levels.
OpenAI previously released Neural MMO, a “massively multiagent” virtual training ground that plops agents in the middle of an RPG-like world, and Gym, a proving ground for algorithms for reinforcement learning (which involves training machines to do things based on trial and error). More recently, it made available SafetyGym, a suite of tools for developing AI that respects safety constraints while training, and for comparing the “safety” of algorithms and the extent to which those algorithms avoid mistakes while learning.