Difference between revisions of "Hierarchical Clustering; Agglomerative (HAC) & Divisive (HDC)"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* [[AI Solver]] | * [[AI Solver]] | ||
| − | * [[...cluster]] | + | ** [[...cluster]] |
| − | * [[...no, I do not know the amount of groups/classes]] | + | *** [[...no, I do not know the amount of groups/classes]] |
* [[Capabilities]] | * [[Capabilities]] | ||
* [[Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA)]] | * [[Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA)]] | ||
Revision as of 15:53, 2 June 2018
Hierarchical clustering algorithms actually fall into 2 categories: (1) Agglomerative; bottom-up or (2) Divisive; top-down
Agglomerative Clustering - Bottom Up
Bottom-up algorithms treat each data point as a single cluster at the outset and then successively merge (or agglomerate) pairs of clusters until all clusters have been merged into a single cluster that contains all data points. Bottom-up hierarchical clustering is therefore called hierarchical agglomerative clustering or HAC. This hierarchy of clusters is represented as a tree (or dendrogram). The root of the tree is the unique cluster that gathers all the samples, the leaves being the clusters with only one sample. The 5 Clustering Algorithms Data Scientists Need to Know | Towards Data Science
Hierarchical clustering does not require us to specify the number of clusters and we can even select which number of clusters looks best since we are building a tree. Additionally, the algorithm is not sensitive to the choice of distance metric; all of them tend to work equally well whereas with other clustering algorithms, the choice of distance metric is critical. A particularly good use case of hierarchical clustering methods is when the underlying data has a hierarchical structure and you want to recover the hierarchy; other clustering algorithms can’t do this. These advantages of hierarchical clustering come at the cost of lower efficiency, as it has a time complexity of O(n³), unlike the linear complexity of K-Means and GMM.
Divisive Clustering = Top Down