Difference between revisions of "Explainable / Interpretable AI"

From
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
* [[AI Verification and Validation]]
 
* [[AI Verification and Validation]]
 +
* [[Evaluation Measures - Classification Performance]]
 
* [[Journey to Singularity]]
 
* [[Journey to Singularity]]
 
* [[Automated Machine Learning (AML) - AutoML]]
 
* [[Automated Machine Learning (AML) - AutoML]]

Revision as of 21:46, 23 July 2019

Youtube search... ...Google search

  • Tools:
    • LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) explains the prediction of any classifier
    • ELI5 debug machine learning classifiers and explain their predictions & inspect black-box models
    • SHAP debug machine learning classifiers and explain their predictions & inspect black-box models

AI system produces results with an account of the path the system took to derive the solution/prediction - transparency of interpretation, rationale and justification. 'If you have a good causal model of the world you are dealing with, you can generalize even in unfamiliar situations. That’s crucial. We humans are able to project ourselves into situations that are very different from our day-to-day experience. Machines are not, because they don’t have these causal models. We can hand-craft them but that’s not enough. We need machines that can discover causal models. To some extend it’s never going to be perfect. We don’t have a perfect causal model of the reality, that’s why we make a lot of mistakes. But we are much better off at doing this than other animals.' Yoshua Benjio