Difference between revisions of "Discriminative vs. Generative"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Generative+Discriminative+Modeling YouTube search...] | [http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Generative+Discriminative+Modeling YouTube search...] | ||
[http://www.google.com/search?q=Generative+Discriminative+Modeling ...Google search] | [http://www.google.com/search?q=Generative+Discriminative+Modeling ...Google search] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Algorithms]] | ||
Application-specific details ultimately dictate the suitability of selecting a discriminative versus generative model. Model Contrasts... | Application-specific details ultimately dictate the suitability of selecting a discriminative versus generative model. Model Contrasts... | ||
Revision as of 19:11, 20 April 2019
YouTube search... ...Google search
Application-specific details ultimately dictate the suitability of selecting a discriminative versus generative model. Model Contrasts...
- Discriminative
- learn the (hard or soft) boundary between classes
- providing classification splits (probabilistic or non-probabilistic manner)
- allow you to classify points, without providing a model of how the points are actually generated
- don't have generative properties
- make few assumptions of the model structure
- less tied to a particular structure
- better performance with lots of example data; higher accuracy, which mostly leads to better learning result
- discriminative models can yield superior performance (in part because they have fewer variables to compute)
- saves calculation resource
- can outperform generative if assumptions are not satisfied (real world is messy and assumptions are rarely perfectly satisfied)
- not designed to use unlabeled data; are inherently supervised and cannot easily support unsupervised learning
- do not generally function for outlier detection
- do not offer such clear representations of relations between features and classes in the dataset
- yields representations of boundaries (more than generative)
- do not allow one to generate samples from the joint distribution of observed and target variables
- generates lower asymptotic errors
- Generative
- requires less training samples
- model the distribution of individual classes
- provides a model of how the data is actually generated
- learn the underlying structure of the data
- have discriminative properties
- make some kind of structure assumptions on your model
- decision boundary: where one model becomes more likely
- often outperform discriminative models on smaller datasets because their generative assumptions place some structure on your model that prevent overfitting
- natural use of unlabeled data
- takes all data into consideration, which could result in slower processing as a disadvantage
- generally function for outlier detection
- typically specified as probabilistic graphical models, which offer rich representations of the independence relations in the dataset
- more straightforward to detect distribution changes and update a generative model
- takes the joint probability and predicts the most possible known label
- typically more flexible in expressing dependencies in complex learning tasks
- a flexible framework that could easily cooperate with other needs of the application
- results in higher asymptotic errors faster
- training method usually requires multiple numerical optimization techniques
- will need the combination of multiple subtasks for a solving complex real-world problem
?