Difference between revisions of "Explainable / Interpretable AI"

From
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* [[AI Verification and Validation]]
 
* [[AI Verification and Validation]]
 
* [[Journey to Singularity]]
 
* [[Journey to Singularity]]
* [[Self Learning Artificial Intelligence - AutoML & World Models]]
+
* [[Automated Machine Learning (AML) - AutoML]]
 
* [http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07623 Explanations] based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negatives - IBM
 
* [http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07623 Explanations] based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negatives - IBM
 
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2903469 Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation | Wachter. S, Mittelstadt, B., Florida, L - University of Oxford], 28 Dec 2016  
 
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2903469 Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation | Wachter. S, Mittelstadt, B., Florida, L - University of Oxford], 28 Dec 2016  

Revision as of 20:38, 5 March 2019

Youtube search... ...Google search

AI system produces results with an account of the path the system took to derive the solution/prediction - transparency of interpretation, rationale and justification. 'If you have a good causal model of the world you are dealing with, you can generalize even in unfamiliar situations. That’s crucial. We humans are able to project ourselves into situations that are very different from our day-to-day experience. Machines are not, because they don’t have these causal models. We can hand-craft them but that’s not enough. We need machines that can discover causal models. To some extend it’s never going to be perfect. We don’t have a perfect causal model of the reality, that’s why we make a lot of mistakes. But we are much better off at doing this than other animals.' Yoshua Benjio