Difference between revisions of "Explainable / Interpretable AI"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* [[AI Verification and Validation]] | * [[AI Verification and Validation]] | ||
* [[Journey to Singularity]] | * [[Journey to Singularity]] | ||
| − | * [[ | + | * [[Self Learning Artificial Intelligence - AutoML & World Models]] |
* [http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07623 Explanations] based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negatives - IBM | * [http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07623 Explanations] based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negatives - IBM | ||
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2903469 Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation | Wachter. S, Mittelstadt, B., Florida, L - University of Oxford], 28 Dec 2016 | * [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2903469 Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation | Wachter. S, Mittelstadt, B., Florida, L - University of Oxford], 28 Dec 2016 | ||
Revision as of 08:55, 4 August 2018
- AI Verification and Validation
- Journey to Singularity
- Self Learning Artificial Intelligence - AutoML & World Models
- Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negatives - IBM
- Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation | Wachter. S, Mittelstadt, B., Florida, L - University of Oxford, 28 Dec 2016
- This is What Happens When Deep Learning Neural Networks Hallucinate | Kimberley Mok
AI system produces results with an account of the path the system took to derive the solution/prediction - transparency of interpretation, rationale and justification
