Difference between revisions of "Law"
m (→blockchain, AI and Law) |
m |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* [http://interestingengineering.com/ai-vs-lawyers-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-and-law AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering] | * [http://interestingengineering.com/ai-vs-lawyers-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-and-law AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering] | ||
* [http://www.bnh.ai/ Bnh.ai] ...a law firm focused on AI ...[http://github.com/bnh-ai/resources Sample AI Incident Response Checklist] | * [http://www.bnh.ai/ Bnh.ai] ...a law firm focused on AI ...[http://github.com/bnh-ai/resources Sample AI Incident Response Checklist] | ||
− | * [http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/05/could-a-stranger-hijack-your-smart-home Could a stranger hijack your smart home? | Vanity Fair] Perhaps most alarming of all is that hijacking an Amazon Echo does not appear to violate any existing laws. Our antiquated U.S. legal code hasn’t caught up with the likes of smart devices, and it’s legal—though “counter to the public interest,” per the Federal Communications Commission—to broadcast subliminal messages via machine. Subliminal messages may be considered a violation of privacy, but that concept has not been successfully extended in court to machines. At least not yet. | + | * [http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/05/could-a-stranger-hijack-your-smart-home Could a stranger hijack your smart home? | Vanity Fair] Perhaps most alarming of all is that hijacking an Amazon Echo does not appear to violate any existing laws. Our antiquated U.S. legal code hasn’t caught up with the likes of smart devices, and it’s legal—though “counter to the public interest,” per the Federal Communications Commission—to broadcast subliminal messages via machine. Subliminal messages may be considered a violation of [[privacy]], but that concept has not been successfully extended in court to machines. At least not yet. |
{|<!-- T --> | {|<!-- T --> |
Revision as of 23:36, 26 September 2020
Youtube search... ...Google search
- Case Studies
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)
- LegalSifter
- knowsPremonition generated the World's largest litigation database, and able to read and analyze over 50,000 documents a second.
- AI Judges and Juries | Logan Kugler - Communications of the ACM
- AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering
- Bnh.ai ...a law firm focused on AI ...Sample AI Incident Response Checklist
- Could a stranger hijack your smart home? | Vanity Fair Perhaps most alarming of all is that hijacking an Amazon Echo does not appear to violate any existing laws. Our antiquated U.S. legal code hasn’t caught up with the likes of smart devices, and it’s legal—though “counter to the public interest,” per the Federal Communications Commission—to broadcast subliminal messages via machine. Subliminal messages may be considered a violation of privacy, but that concept has not been successfully extended in court to machines. At least not yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contents
Extracting Legal Data
|
|
Contracts
|
|
Blockchain, AI and Law
|
|
Artificial Intelligence and Law – An Overview and History
Artificial Intelligence LawYouTube search... ...Google search Having a usable definition of AI – and soon – is vital for regulation and governance because laws and policies simply will not operate without one. This definition problem crops up in all regulatory contexts, from ensuring truthful use of the term “AI” in product advertising right through to establishing how next-generation automated weapons systems (AWSs) are treated under the laws of war. ________________________________________
|