Difference between revisions of "Law"
m (→blockchain, AI and Law) |
m |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|title=PRIMO.ai | |title=PRIMO.ai | ||
|titlemode=append | |titlemode=append | ||
− | |keywords=artificial, intelligence, machine, learning, models, algorithms, data, singularity, moonshot, | + | |keywords=artificial, intelligence, machine, learning, models, algorithms, data, singularity, moonshot, TensorFlow, Facebook, Google, Nvidia, Microsoft, Azure, Amazon, AWS |
|description=Helpful resources for your journey with artificial intelligence; videos, articles, techniques, courses, profiles, and tools | |description=Helpful resources for your journey with artificial intelligence; videos, articles, techniques, courses, profiles, and tools | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [[Case Studies]] | * [[Case Studies]] | ||
+ | ** [[Risk, Compliance and Regulation]] | ||
** [[Government Services]] | ** [[Government Services]] | ||
+ | ** [[Law Enforcement]] | ||
+ | * [[Other Challenges]] in Artificial Intelligence | ||
+ | * [[Explainable / Interpretable AI]] | ||
+ | * [[Bias and Variances]] | ||
+ | * [[Privacy]] | ||
+ | * [[Ethics]] | ||
* [[Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)#Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)|Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)]] | * [[Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)#Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)|Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)]] | ||
* [http://www.legalsifter.com/ LegalSifter] | * [http://www.legalsifter.com/ LegalSifter] | ||
Line 16: | Line 23: | ||
* [http://interestingengineering.com/ai-vs-lawyers-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-and-law AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering] | * [http://interestingengineering.com/ai-vs-lawyers-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-and-law AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering] | ||
* [http://www.bnh.ai/ Bnh.ai] ...a law firm focused on AI ...[http://github.com/bnh-ai/resources Sample AI Incident Response Checklist] | * [http://www.bnh.ai/ Bnh.ai] ...a law firm focused on AI ...[http://github.com/bnh-ai/resources Sample AI Incident Response Checklist] | ||
− | * [http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/05/could-a-stranger-hijack-your-smart-home Could a stranger hijack your smart home? | Vanity Fair] Perhaps most alarming of all is that hijacking an Amazon Echo does not appear to violate any existing laws. Our antiquated U.S. legal code hasn’t caught up with the likes of smart devices, and it’s legal—though “counter to the public interest,” per the Federal Communications Commission—to broadcast subliminal messages via machine. Subliminal messages may be considered a violation of privacy, but that concept has not been successfully extended in court to machines. At least not yet. | + | * [http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/05/could-a-stranger-hijack-your-smart-home Could a stranger hijack your smart home? | Vanity Fair] Perhaps most alarming of all is that hijacking an Amazon Echo does not appear to violate any existing laws. Our antiquated U.S. legal code hasn’t caught up with the likes of smart devices, and it’s legal—though “counter to the public interest,” per the Federal Communications Commission—to broadcast subliminal messages via machine. Subliminal messages may be considered a violation of [[privacy]], but that concept has not been successfully extended in court to machines. At least not yet. |
{|<!-- T --> | {|<!-- T --> | ||
Line 136: | Line 143: | ||
<youtube>MBKjpRuCvNE</youtube> | <youtube>MBKjpRuCvNE</youtube> | ||
<b>Code is Not the Law: [[Decentralized: Federated & Distributed#Blockchain|Blockchain]] Contracts and Artificial Intelligence | <b>Code is Not the Law: [[Decentralized: Federated & Distributed#Blockchain|Blockchain]] Contracts and Artificial Intelligence | ||
− | </b><br>This presentation is from The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence conference that took place October 14-15, 2016. It was hosted by the NYU Center for Bioethics in conjunction with the NYU Center for Mind, Brain and Consciousness.Speaker: Adam Kolber (Brooklyn Law School) Publisher: Livestream.com | + | </b><br>This presentation is from The [[Ethics]] of Artificial Intelligence conference that took place October 14-15, 2016. It was hosted by the NYU Center for Bioethics in conjunction with the NYU Center for Mind, Brain and Consciousness.Speaker: Adam Kolber (Brooklyn Law School) Publisher: Livestream.com |
|} | |} | ||
|<!-- M --> | |<!-- M --> | ||
Line 180: | Line 187: | ||
|| | || | ||
<youtube>BTkXas77jeg</youtube> | <youtube>BTkXas77jeg</youtube> | ||
− | <b>Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics: Law, Governance and Public Policy | + | <b>Artificial Intelligence (AI) [[Ethics]]: Law, Governance and Public Policy |
</b><br>Artificial intelligence is fraught with legal, ethical, and public policy challenges. This episode brings two esteemed experts to discuss these issues and present guidance for both commercial companies and the public sector. | </b><br>Artificial intelligence is fraught with legal, ethical, and public policy challenges. This episode brings two esteemed experts to discuss these issues and present guidance for both commercial companies and the public sector. | ||
Dr. David A. Bray is CIO of Federal Communications Commission. He began work in public service at age 15, later serving in the private sector before returning as IT Chief for the CDC’s Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Program during 9/11; volunteering to deploy to Afghanistan to “think differently” on military and humanitarian issues; and serving as a Senior Executive advocating for increased information interoperability, cybersecurity, and civil liberty protections. He serves as a Visiting Executive In-Residence at Harvard University, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a Visiting Associate at the University of Oxford. | Dr. David A. Bray is CIO of Federal Communications Commission. He began work in public service at age 15, later serving in the private sector before returning as IT Chief for the CDC’s Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Program during 9/11; volunteering to deploy to Afghanistan to “think differently” on military and humanitarian issues; and serving as a Senior Executive advocating for increased information interoperability, cybersecurity, and civil liberty protections. He serves as a Visiting Executive In-Residence at Harvard University, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a Visiting Associate at the University of Oxford. | ||
− | Kay Firth-Butterfield is a Barrister and part-time Judge and has worked as a mediator, arbitrator, business owner and professor in the United Kingdom. In the United States, she is Chief Officer, and member, of the Lucid.ai Ethics Advisory Panel (EAP) and an adjunct Professor of Law. Kay is a humanitarian with a strong sense of social justice and has advanced degrees in Law and International Relations. Kay co-founded the Consortium for Law and Policy of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics at the University of Texas and taught its first course: Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies: Law and Policy. She is Vice Chair of the IEEE Industry Connections Committee “Global Initiative for Ethical Considerations in the Design of Autonomous Systems”. | + | Kay Firth-Butterfield is a Barrister and part-time Judge and has worked as a mediator, arbitrator, business owner and professor in the United Kingdom. In the United States, she is Chief Officer, and member, of the Lucid.ai [[Ethics]] Advisory Panel (EAP) and an adjunct Professor of Law. Kay is a humanitarian with a strong sense of social justice and has advanced degrees in Law and International Relations. Kay co-founded the Consortium for Law and Policy of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics at the University of Texas and taught its first course: Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies: Law and Policy. She is Vice Chair of the IEEE Industry Connections Committee “Global Initiative for Ethical Considerations in the Design of Autonomous Systems”. |
|} | |} | ||
|<!-- M --> | |<!-- M --> |
Revision as of 22:39, 3 November 2020
Youtube search... ...Google search
- Case Studies
- Other Challenges in Artificial Intelligence
- Explainable / Interpretable AI
- Bias and Variances
- Privacy
- Ethics
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)
- LegalSifter
- knowsPremonition generated the World's largest litigation database, and able to read and analyze over 50,000 documents a second.
- AI Judges and Juries | Logan Kugler - Communications of the ACM
- AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering
- Bnh.ai ...a law firm focused on AI ...Sample AI Incident Response Checklist
- Could a stranger hijack your smart home? | Vanity Fair Perhaps most alarming of all is that hijacking an Amazon Echo does not appear to violate any existing laws. Our antiquated U.S. legal code hasn’t caught up with the likes of smart devices, and it’s legal—though “counter to the public interest,” per the Federal Communications Commission—to broadcast subliminal messages via machine. Subliminal messages may be considered a violation of privacy, but that concept has not been successfully extended in court to machines. At least not yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contents
Extracting Legal Data
|
|
Contracts
|
|
Blockchain, AI and Law
|
|
Artificial Intelligence and Law – An Overview and History
Artificial Intelligence LawYouTube search... ...Google search Having a usable definition of AI – and soon – is vital for regulation and governance because laws and policies simply will not operate without one. This definition problem crops up in all regulatory contexts, from ensuring truthful use of the term “AI” in product advertising right through to establishing how next-generation automated weapons systems (AWSs) are treated under the laws of war. ________________________________________
|