Difference between revisions of "Topology and Weight Evolving Artificial Neural Network (TWEANN)"

From
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
==== Comparison with gradient descent ====
 
==== Comparison with gradient descent ====
 
Most neural networks use gradient descent rather than neuroevolution. However, around 2017 researchers at Uber stated they had found that simple structural neuroevolution algorithms were competitive with sophisticated modern industry-standard gradient-descent deep learning algorithms, in part because neuroevolution was found to be less likely to get stuck in local minima.  
 
Most neural networks use gradient descent rather than neuroevolution. However, around 2017 researchers at Uber stated they had found that simple structural neuroevolution algorithms were competitive with sophisticated modern industry-standard gradient-descent deep learning algorithms, in part because neuroevolution was found to be less likely to get stuck in local minima.  
 +
 +
==== Topology ====
 +
But there's an issue we haven't yet addressed: how do you determine what connects to what in the first place? In other words, the behavior of your brain is not only determined by the weights of its connections, but by the overall architecture of the brain itself. Stochastic gradient descent does not even attempt to address this question. Rather, it simply does its best with the connections it is provided. [http://www.oreilly.com/ideas/neuroevolution-a-different-kind-of-deep-learning Neuroevolution: A different kind of deep learning | Kenneth O. Stanley]
 +
  
 
http://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/600/1*SrhRHdHjTDkAbq8W-ZMfSQ.png
 
http://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/600/1*SrhRHdHjTDkAbq8W-ZMfSQ.png
  
 
<youtube>kHyNqSnzP8Y</youtube>
 
<youtube>kHyNqSnzP8Y</youtube>

Revision as of 21:40, 19 January 2019

Youtube search... ...Google search

Many neuroevolution algorithms have been defined. One common distinction is between algorithms that evolve only the strength of the connection weights for a fixed network topology (sometimes called conventional neuroevolution), as opposed to those that evolve both the topology of the network and its weights

Comparison with gradient descent

Most neural networks use gradient descent rather than neuroevolution. However, around 2017 researchers at Uber stated they had found that simple structural neuroevolution algorithms were competitive with sophisticated modern industry-standard gradient-descent deep learning algorithms, in part because neuroevolution was found to be less likely to get stuck in local minima.

Topology

But there's an issue we haven't yet addressed: how do you determine what connects to what in the first place? In other words, the behavior of your brain is not only determined by the weights of its connections, but by the overall architecture of the brain itself. Stochastic gradient descent does not even attempt to address this question. Rather, it simply does its best with the connections it is provided. Neuroevolution: A different kind of deep learning | Kenneth O. Stanley


1*SrhRHdHjTDkAbq8W-ZMfSQ.png