Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)

Youtube search... ...Google search

• Framing Context
• Enterprise Architecture (EA) ... What is a Capability?
• Defense
• AcqNotes: ... Search/TopicList ... Dictionary
  • Main References
    • Main Acquisition References: Website: Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG), DoD Directive 5000.01: The Defense Acquisition System, DoD Instruction 5000.02: Operation of the Adaptive Acquisition Framework, DoD Instruction 5000.85 “Major Capability Acquisition”, DoD Directive 7045.14: Program Planning Budget & Execution (PPBE) Process, and DAU Program Managers Toolkit.
      • JCIDS Process - CJCSI 3170.01 “JCIDS” ...This instruction establishes the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) as the process used by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) to fulfill its advisory responsibilities to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in identifying, assessing, validating, and prioritizing joint military capability requirements
        • Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC)
        • CJCS Instruction 3170.01H Charter of The Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) and Implementation of The Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) | Joint Staff
        • Manual for the Operations of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) -18 Dec 2015
        • CJCSI 3180.01 “Joint Requirements Oversight Council” – 31 October 2001
        • JCIDS Process Flow Chart
        • Website: JCIDS Intellipedia (CAC Required)
        • Tools - Training Resources/Training Organizations - videos
    • Key Guides and Handbooks: Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule Preparation and User Guide, DAU Systems Engineering Fundamentals, Test and Evaluation Management Guide, GAO Cost Estimating Guide, Draft Naval Aviation Systems Team Acquisition Logistics Support Plan Guide, and Navy DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process Handbook
      • JCIDS Process - Capabilities Based Assessment (CBA)
        • Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) User’s Guide version 3. March 2009
      • Systems Engineering Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)
        • Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Writers Guide August 2009
    • DoD Document Databases: DoD Directives, DoD Instructions, DoD Manuals, Website: ASSIST forDefense Standardization Program (DSP), and EverySpec.com]...Specifications, Standards, Handbooks and Mil-Spec documents
  • DoD Guides and Handbooks
    • DAU – Publications and Catalogs
    • Navy Handbooks, Guides & Reports
  • Milestone Requirements Matrix ..tab ACAT I, ACAT II, and ACAT III & Below
  • Templates ...main templates that are used in defense acquisitions; need to check with requesting organization
• Major Capability Acquisition | DAU
• Information Technology - Defense Business Systems (DBS) |AcqNotes
  • DOD Instruction 5000.75 Business Systems Requirements and Acquisition
• Acquisition Process - Acquisition of Services |AcqNotes
  • DoD Instruction 5000.74 Acquisition of Services | Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment
  • DoDi 5000.74 Presentation | Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy

Defense Acquisition University (DAU)

• Media

The Defense Acquisition System in 7 Minutes Provides an overview of the Defense Acquisition System, focusing on phases, milestones, and decision points.

The Acquisition Moment: Defense Acquisition Explained with S'mores Defense acquisition is complex. That doesn't mean it's impossible to understand. Learn how Warfighter needs flow through the acquisition process and its various milestones through the lens of making s'mores.

1 Defense Acquisition System Overview DAU Professor Matt Ambrose provides an overview of the Defense Acquisition System as described in the Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System.

2 Materiel Solution Analysis Phase Overview DAU Professor Matt Ambrose provides an overview of the Materiel Solution Analysis Phase of the Defense Acquisition System as described in the Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System.

3 Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Phase Overview DAU Professor Matt Ambrose provides an overview of the Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Phase of the Defense Acquisition System as described in the Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System.

Defense Acquisition Categories Defense Acquisition U professor Matt Ambrose provides a top-level description of Acquisition Categories (ACATs) used in the U.S. Department of Defense and the role such categories play in the management of acquisition programs. Ambrose also discusses the differences between weapon system and automated information system categories and provides an explanation of what makes a system a Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP) or a Major Automated Information System (MAIS). The DoDI 5000.02 and Milestone Documentation Identification tool (MDID) are referred to for further exploration of the topic and practical application.

AcqNotes Videos

DoD Acquisition Process AcqNotes The Defense Acquisition Process July 16, 2017

DoD JCIDS Process Overview AcqNotes Nov 4, 2012

PPBE Process Overview AcqNotes This tutorial provides an overview of the Programming, Planning, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) Process. Nov 12, 2012

Acquisition Categories (ACAT) Jan 9, 2013

U.S. Army Command and General Staff College (CGSC) - James Kennedy

F100 CGSC JCIDS James Kennedy Supplemental instruction video for the JCIDS class within the CGSC F100 How the Army Runs block of instruction.

CGSC F100 Course Review James Kennedy This video provides a review of the F100 course at CGSC explaining the Force Management Module and using a simulated case study to explain all the F100 processes in one presentation.

Resource Management James Kennedy This video supports the CGSC F100 Force Management Core Curriculum block of instruction.

F100 - Fiscal Stewardship James Kennedy This lesson is designed to supplement the CGSC F100 Force Management.

The Adaptive Acquisition Framework (AAF)

• Adaptive Acquisition Framework | DAU
• The Adaptive Acquisition Framework - Better, Faster, More Tailored
• Overview of the Adaptive Acquisition Framework | Stacy Cummings, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition
• Modernizing DoD Software Production | Jeff Boleng, OUSD(A&S), Special Assistant for Software Acquisition

a major advancement for modern defense acquisition. It is more than a policy update. It is policy re-envisioned and restructured in a framework that encourages critical thinking by program managers in selecting and tailoring the best suited approach or pathway for a particular acquisition. It facilitates more rapid delivery to the point of need.

Overview of the Adaptive Acquisition Framework with Stacy Cummings Feb. 20, 2020, Stacy Cummings, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition Enablers, delivers an overview of the DoD's new Adaptive Acquisition Framework as part of the annual Acquisition Update held at the DAU campus in Huntsville, Ala. During the hour-long presentation, Cummings addressed some of the monumental changes that the framework brings to DoD acquisition policy. The session also provided a look at the six new acquisition pathways programs can use to add flexibility and speed to their strategies.

Adaptive Acquisition Framework: Software Pathway In this round table discussion, senior DoD leaders and experts from the field discuss the interim software policy that is part of the new Adaptive Acquisition Framework. Based largely on the SWAP Report Line of Effort A1, released by the Defense Innovation Board, the policy establishes a new acquisition pathway for software that prioritize continuous integration and delivery of working software in a secure manner, with continuous oversight from automated analytics. Moderator: Dr. Jeff Boleng, Special Assistant for Software Acquisition. Panel members: a. Stacy Cummings, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense/ Acquisition Enablers, OUSD A-S b. Carmela Rice, OUSD A-S c. Robert Borka, Director, Navy Acquisition Policy, DASN APB d. Maj Zachary McCarty, Program Manager, F-22 Pipeline Operations.

Thinking Differently: Cybersecurity and the Adaptive Acquisition Framework NavalX

Adaptive Acquisition Framework: Software Authority to Operate Authority to Operate Reciprocity between Programs, Services and Agencies. Moderator: Dr. Jeff Boleng, Senior Advisor for Software Acquisition Roundtable. Panelists: Mr. Leo Garciga, U.S. Army, Director of Information Management, HQDA-DCS-G2 Mr. Chris Cleary, Navy Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) and Director of the DON CIO Cybersecurity Directorate Ms. Lonye Ford, HAF RSRC MGMT.

Analysis

How to create a capability model Raj Ramesh The capability model is one of the foundational models to understand the capabilities of the enterprise. It is often used as the basis of other analyses such as process analysis, spend analysis, prioritization of work, etc. So it behooves the enterprise to create and have one capability model that is common for the whole enterprise. How do you start this exercise? In this video, I explain precisely that. Background Music attribution:: Across the Room - YouTube - Letter Box Here's what I can do to help you. I speak on the topics of architecture and AI, help you integrate AI into your organization, educate your team on what AI can or cannot do, and make things simple enough that you can take action from your new knowledge. I work with your organization to understand the nuances and challenges that you face, and together we can understand, frame, analyze, and address challenges in a systematic way so you see improvement in your overall business, is aligned with your strategy, and most importantly, you and your organization can incrementally change to transform and thrive in the future. If any of this sounds like something you might need, please reach out to me at dr.raj.ramesh@topsigma.com, and we'll get back in touch within a day. Thanks for watching my videos and for subscribing. www.topsigma.com www.linkedin.com/in/rajramesh

SERC TALKS: ’Mission Engineering’: Systems of Systems Engineering in Context Today most organizational or societal capabilities rely on a mix of material and non-material ‘systems’ working together to achieve desired outcomes – to achieve their ‘mission’. Organizations typically define mission statements about why they exist – their “reason for being” -- and they use these mission statements as the basis for planning actions and investments. Government or religious organizations often form ‘mission’ teams to achieve a set of goals to share ideas or conduct negotiations. Space and defense organizations commonly refer to planned actions to achieve objectives as their ‘missions’ - e.g. US NASA Apollo mission to the moon. In most cases these include a set of objectives and a plan of actions to achieve these objectives. Recently US Defense has started to apply systems engineering concepts and practices to missions in what is being termed ‘Mission Engineering” - the deliberate planning, analyzing, organizing, and integrating of current and emerging operational and system capabilities to achieve desired mission effects. In this presentation Dr. Dahmann will discuss the motivation for employing systems approaches to mission capabilities as an extension and a broader context for application of systems of systems engineering. BIO: Dr. Judith Dahmann is a Technical Fellow at the MITRE Corporation Center and the capability lead for Systems of Systems (SoS). Dr. Dahmann is the MITRE project leader for SE Technical Support to OUSD R&E supporting mission engineering (ME) activities and the application of digital engineering to ME. She was the technical lead for development of the DoD guide for systems engineering of systems of systems (SoS) and the project lead for ISO 21839, a international standard on ‘SoS Considerations Throughout the System Life Cycle’. Dr. Dahmann is also the task lead for a set of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) SoS programs investigating advanced technology approaches to complex SoS challenges. Dr. Dahmann is an INCOSE Fellow and the co-chair of the INCOSE Systems of Systems Working Group and the co-chair of the NDIA SE Division SoS Committee. She teaches Enterprise SE as an adjunct faculty member of the Johns Hopkins University in the Systems Engineering Program for Engineering Professionals. Presented on August 5, 2020

Graphs in Government: Achieving Total Cost Visibility for the U.S. Army Maximizing cost visibility is a common goal for large organizations, including the United States Department of Defense. The United States Army is required to track operating and support costs for weapon systems including weapons definition, force structure, inventory, requisitions, maintenance, ammunition and more. That equates to a vast amount of data and growing data management complexities. To address these challenges and achieve total cost visibility, the Army adopted the Neo4j graph database to create, manage, and analyze data relationships across the logistics community. In this webinar, Jason Zagalsky, Federal Account Manager at Neo4j, will provide a brief overview of Neo4j and Graphs In Government, followed by Preston Hendrickson, Principal Systems Analyst at CALIBRE Systems, describing how modernizing its cost tracking system gave the Army the cost visibility needed to meet DoD objectives

Resolving America’s Defense Strategy-Resource Mismatch: The Case for Cost-Per-Effect Analysis The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies Read the report here: https://bit.ly/31WPlha Slides from presentation available here: http://bit.ly/31Unb6x To support and see more of this content, like this video and subscribe to the Mitchell Institute’s channel. The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies held a live virtual rollout of its latest report Resolving America’s Defense Strategy-Resource Mismatch: The Case for Cost-Per-Effect Analysis by Lt Gen (Ret) David A. Deptula, Dean of the Mitchell Institute, and Douglas A. Birkey, Executive Director of the Mitchell Institute. The two authors hosted a panel discussion on the need to adopt cost-per-effect assessments across the Department of Defense as the preferred measure of merit in evaluating weapon system choices. They were joined on the panel by Dr. Bill LaPlante, Senior VP and General Manager for MITRE Corporation's National Security Sector, and Brig Gen David Harris, Director of the Air Force Warfighting Integration Capability (AFWIC) and Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategy, Integration, and Requirements.