Difference between revisions of "Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks"

From
Jump to: navigation, search
(MagNet)
(MagNet)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
== MagNet ==
 
== MagNet ==
  
* MagNet includes one or more separate detector networks and a reformer network. The detector networks learn to differentiate between normal and adversarial examples by approximating the manifold of normal examples. Since they assume no specific process for generating adversarial examples, they generalize well. The reformer network moves adversarial examples towards the manifold of normal examples, which is effective for correctly classifying adversarial examples with small perturbation.  We discuss the intrinsic difficulties in defending against whitebox attack and propose a mechanism to defend against graybox attack. Inspired by the use of randomness in cryptography, we use diversity to strengthen MagNet. We show empirically that MagNet is effective against the most advanced state-of-the-art attacks in blackbox and graybox scenarios without sacrificing false positive rate on normal examples.[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.09064.pdf MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examples | Meng, D., Chen, H. ], 11 Sep 2017
+
* MagNet includes one or more separate detector networks and a reformer network. The detector networks learn to differentiate between normal and adversarial examples by approximating the manifold of normal examples. Since they assume no specific process for generating adversarial examples, they generalize well. The reformer network moves adversarial examples towards the manifold of normal examples, which is effective for correctly classifying adversarial examples with small perturbation.  We discuss the intrinsic difficulties in defending against whitebox attack and propose a mechanism to defend against graybox attack. Inspired by the use of randomness in cryptography, we use diversity to strengthen MagNet. We show empirically that MagNet is effective against the most advanced state-of-the-art attacks in blackbox and graybox scenarios without sacrificing false positive rate on normal examples.[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.09064.pdf MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examples | Meng, D., Chen, H.], 11 Sep 2017
 
   
 
   
* [http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~hchen/paper/meng2017-slides.pdf MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examples]
+
* [http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~hchen/paper/meng2017-slides.pdf MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examples - Presentation | Meng, D., Chen, H.]
  
 
<youtube>wZ-wIdAcWQE</youtube>
 
<youtube>wZ-wIdAcWQE</youtube>

Revision as of 21:41, 5 July 2018

Youtube search...

______________________________________________________


MagNet

  • MagNet includes one or more separate detector networks and a reformer network. The detector networks learn to differentiate between normal and adversarial examples by approximating the manifold of normal examples. Since they assume no specific process for generating adversarial examples, they generalize well. The reformer network moves adversarial examples towards the manifold of normal examples, which is effective for correctly classifying adversarial examples with small perturbation. We discuss the intrinsic difficulties in defending against whitebox attack and propose a mechanism to defend against graybox attack. Inspired by the use of randomness in cryptography, we use diversity to strengthen MagNet. We show empirically that MagNet is effective against the most advanced state-of-the-art attacks in blackbox and graybox scenarios without sacrificing false positive rate on normal examples.MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examples | Meng, D., Chen, H., 11 Sep 2017