Difference between revisions of "Offense - Adversarial Threats/Attacks"

From
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{#seo:
 +
|title=PRIMO.ai
 +
|titlemode=append
 +
|keywords=artificial, intelligence, machine, learning, models, algorithms, data, singularity, moonshot, Tensorflow, Google, Nvidia, Microsoft, Azure, Amazon, AWS
 +
|description=Helpful resources for your journey with artificial intelligence; videos, articles, techniques, courses, profiles, and tools
 +
}}
 
[http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Adversarial+threat+attack+defcon+Deep+Learning+Artificial+Intelligence Youtube search...]
 
[http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Adversarial+threat+attack+defcon+Deep+Learning+Artificial+Intelligence Youtube search...]
 +
[http://www.google.com/search?q=adversarial+threat+attack+defcon+deep+machine+learning+ML+artificial+intelligence ...Google search]
  
 
* [[Cybersecurity]]
 
* [[Cybersecurity]]

Revision as of 13:46, 2 February 2019

Youtube search... ...Google search

______________________________________________________


Adversarial examples are inputs to machine learning models that an attacker has intentionally designed to cause the model to make a mistake; they’re like optical illusions for machines. Myth: An attacker must have access to the model to generate adversarial examples. Fact: Adversarial examples generalize across models trained to perform the same task, even if those models have different architectures and were trained on a different training set. This means an attacker can train their own model, generate adversarial examples against it, and then deploy those adversarial examples against a model they do not have access to. -Deep Learning Adversarial Examples – Clarifying Misconceptions | Goodfellow et al.

endgame-ai-agent.jpg