Difference between revisions of "Center and Circle Playbook Walkthrough Example"

From
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 42: Line 42:
 
* '''Only switch threads when needed:''' T.1–T.8 (deep work), T.9 (Risk Register update), T.10 (Learning Log row)
 
* '''Only switch threads when needed:''' T.1–T.8 (deep work), T.9 (Risk Register update), T.10 (Learning Log row)
 
* '''End every week by writing one row into:''' '''T.10 Thread: Learning Log'''
 
* '''End every week by writing one row into:''' '''T.10 Thread: Learning Log'''
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
== Walkthrough Flowchart (Text-Only) — Weeks → Threads Used ==
 +
''Text-only flowchart in MediaWiki format (no Mermaid required).''
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
 +
|-
 +
! Legend
 +
|-
 +
| '''[T.x]''' = Thread used   •   '''→''' = next step in the weekly path   •   '''(optional)''' = used only if needed
 +
|}
 +
 +
=== Overall Loop (Every Week) ===
 +
<pre>
 +
Start → [T.0 Control Room] Run W.1→W.7
 +
      → (switch to 1–2 deep-work threads only if needed)
 +
      → [T.9 Risk Register] (optional: add/update 1 row)
 +
      → [T.10 Learning Log] record 1 row
 +
      → End (close until next week)
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
=== Week-by-Week Flow (Text Diagram) ===
 +
 +
; Week 1 — “Stop the Drift” (Center)
 +
<pre>
 +
[T.0] Scan → Signals → Center vs Circle → Micro-Experiment
 +
  → [T.1] (optional: scan feels fuzzy)
 +
  → [T.2] Basics checklist + low-energy defaults
 +
  → [T.10] Log row
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
; Week 2 — “Add a Backup” (Center)
 +
<pre>
 +
[T.0] Scan → Signals → Center → Micro-Experiment
 +
  → [T.2] Basics baseline
 +
  → [T.3] Redundancy Plan B
 +
  → [T.9] Risk Register row
 +
  → [T.10] Log row
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
; Week 3 — “Warm the Circle” (Circle)
 +
<pre>
 +
[T.0] Scan → Signals → Circle → Micro-Experiment
 +
  → [T.4] Social Value menu + boundaries
 +
  → [T.5] Scaffolding map + templates + anchor
 +
  → [T.10] Log row
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
; Week 4 — “Repair Fast” (Circle)
 +
<pre>
 +
[T.0] Scan → Signals → Circle → Micro-Experiment
 +
  → [T.6] Relationship Maintenance rotation + fast repair
 +
  → [T.5] (optional: reuse templates / who-to-call)
 +
  → [T.10] Log row
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
; Week 5 — “Cut Load, Protect Sleep” (Center)
 +
<pre>
 +
[T.0] Scan → Signals → Center → Micro-Experiment
 +
  → [T.7] Commitments (define done + cadence + stop-rule)
 +
  → [T.2] Basics protect baseline
 +
  → [T.9] (optional: overload risk row)
 +
  → [T.10] Log row
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
; Week 6 — “Review + Renewal” (Monthly Review)
 +
<pre>
 +
[T.0] Route into review mode
 +
  → [T.8] Review + Renewal scorecard + keep/stop/start
 +
  → [T.9] (optional: stale check → refresh 1 row)
 +
  → [T.10] Log row
 +
</pre>
  
 
----
 
----
Line 66: Line 139:
  
 
== Week 1 (Week Ending 2026-01-10) — First “Real” Run ==
 
== Week 1 (Week Ending 2026-01-10) — First “Real” Run ==
 +
 +
=== The Story (Relatable Narrative) ===
 +
Week 1 starts with a classic situation: nothing is “on fire,” but the person feels a little more scattered than usual. Bedtime has drifted later, the phone keeps the brain “lit up,” and mornings feel foggy. That’s not a crisis — it’s '''drift'''. Drift is dangerous because it’s easy to ignore… until it suddenly becomes loud.
 +
 +
So the playbook is used exactly as intended: run the process once, even imperfectly, and let the workflow surface the simplest stabilizing move.
 +
 +
=== Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale) ===
 +
* The goal is not to “fix life.” It’s to find the one dial that predicts stability.
 +
* Sleep is a multiplier: when it slips, everything gets harder.
 +
* Environmental changes (like where the phone lives) beat willpower.
 +
 
=== Goal ===
 
=== Goal ===
 
* Establish baseline: run W.1 → W.7 once, even if imperfect.
 
* Establish baseline: run W.1 → W.7 once, even if imperfect.
Line 130: Line 214:
  
 
== Week 2 (Week Ending 2026-01-17) — Add Redundancy + First T.9 Entry ==
 
== Week 2 (Week Ending 2026-01-17) — Add Redundancy + First T.9 Entry ==
 +
 +
=== The Story (Relatable Narrative) ===
 +
Week 2 begins with a reality check: even if sleep improves, other systems can wobble. A pain flare shows up and threatens to knock out movement. The person notices an ugly pattern: when pain rises, movement drops; when movement drops, mood and sleep start wobbling again. That’s how a “fine week” turns into a bad one.
 +
 +
So this week is about making the system less brittle: keep the basics stable, add a tiny movement habit, and build a Plan B so one flare doesn’t cascade.
 +
 +
=== Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale) ===
 +
* The vital signals were changed to match the current failure mode (pain/mobility).
 +
* The experiment is deliberately small (8 minutes) to reduce resistance.
 +
* Redundancy is introduced early: Plan B prevents panic and prevents cascade.
 +
 
=== Goal ===
 
=== Goal ===
 
* Keep Center emphasis, but add one “Plan B” backup so life is less brittle.
 
* Keep Center emphasis, but add one “Plan B” backup so life is less brittle.
Line 182: Line 277:
  
 
== Week 3 (Week Ending 2026-01-24) — Shift to Circle: Social Value + Scaffolding ==
 
== Week 3 (Week Ending 2026-01-24) — Shift to Circle: Social Value + Scaffolding ==
 +
 +
=== The Story (Relatable Narrative) ===
 +
Week 3 is where the person realizes something important: even if the Center is improving, the Circle can quietly thin out. They aren’t in crisis — but they feel more alone than they want to be. Isolation rarely feels like a “problem” at first; it feels like “being busy.” Then, when stress hits, there’s nobody nearby to buffer it.
 +
 +
So the emphasis shifts to Circle. The vital signal becomes meaningful contact (not “likes,” not admin texts — real warmth). The experiment is tiny: one warm touchpoint every Tuesday.
 +
 +
=== Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale) ===
 +
* The playbook treats connection as infrastructure, not a luxury.
 +
* “Warm touchpoints” are low-friction and repeatable.
 +
* Social Value + Scaffolding ensures the person contributes without overload.
 +
 
=== Goal ===
 
=== Goal ===
 
* Warm the network before isolation becomes a problem.
 
* Warm the network before isolation becomes a problem.
Line 223: Line 329:
  
 
== Week 4 (Week Ending 2026-01-31) — Relationship Maintenance + Fast Repair ==
 
== Week 4 (Week Ending 2026-01-31) — Relationship Maintenance + Fast Repair ==
 +
 +
=== The Story (Relatable Narrative) ===
 +
Week 4 is a subtle one: the person notices irritability rising. Nothing catastrophic happened — it’s accumulated friction. One relationship feels slightly “stiff,” and they find themselves replaying a conversation in their head. That replay loop is a signal: small cracks are forming.
 +
 +
Instead of waiting, they use the playbook to build a habit: repair one friction within 24 hours. The goal is not to win an argument — it’s to prevent drift from becoming distance.
 +
 +
=== Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale) ===
 +
* Repairs are cheapest when they’re early.
 +
* Scripts reduce emotional labor and prevent defensive spirals.
 +
* A rotation schedule prevents relationships from being “mood-based.”
 +
 
=== Goal ===
 
=== Goal ===
 
* Prevent small friction from becoming relationship drift.
 
* Prevent small friction from becoming relationship drift.
Line 258: Line 375:
  
 
== Week 5 (Week Ending 2026-02-07) — Commitments Audit + Stop-Rule ==
 
== Week 5 (Week Ending 2026-02-07) — Commitments Audit + Stop-Rule ==
 +
 +
=== The Story (Relatable Narrative) ===
 +
Week 5 catches a sneaky failure mode: overload disguised as meaning. The person notices sleep wobbling again — not because of the phone this time, but because commitments are expanding. They feel resentment and dread. That’s not “laziness.” That’s an early warning sign.
 +
 +
So this week is Center-focused: implement a stop-rule and reduce scope on one commitment. The idea is to protect capacity so reliability remains possible.
 +
 +
=== Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale) ===
 +
* Stop-rules convert vague “I should” into objective triggers.
 +
* Scope cuts preserve participation without burning out.
 +
* Risk Register entries make overload visible and reviewable.
 +
 
=== Goal ===
 
=== Goal ===
 
* Reduce overload that harms sleep/stress.
 
* Reduce overload that harms sleep/stress.
Line 294: Line 422:
  
 
== Week 6 (Week Ending 2026-02-14) — Review + Renewal (Upgradeable Identity) ==
 
== Week 6 (Week Ending 2026-02-14) — Review + Renewal (Upgradeable Identity) ==
 +
 +
=== The Story (Relatable Narrative) ===
 +
Week 6 is where the playbook turns into a true learning loop. After multiple weeks of experiments, the person now has real data: sleep improved with environmental change, pain cascades were softened by tiny movement, connection improved with one weekly touchpoint, and overload was reduced with stop-rules.
 +
 +
Now the goal isn’t another new tactic — it’s consolidation: keep what works, stop what doesn’t, and choose one small upgrade that expands options without shattering identity.
 +
 +
=== Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale) ===
 +
* Reviews prevent “random walk” life.
 +
* A simple scorecard makes tradeoffs visible.
 +
* One renewal action avoids identity-overhaul mania.
 +
 
=== Goal ===
 
=== Goal ===
 
* Monthly review to refresh direction without overhauls.
 
* Monthly review to refresh direction without overhauls.

Revision as of 11:32, 12 January 2026

YouTube ... Quora ...Google search ...Google News ...Bing News


Safety Note (Read This First)
The Center and Circle Playbook is for Self-check-ins and planning support. It is not medical, mental health, legal, or emergency advice. If you feel in danger, are considering self-harm, or there is an immediate safety risk, call your local emergency number; if in US call 911. If you’re in need urgent emotional support contact your local emergency services or a trusted local crisis line; if in US you can call or text 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline). When in doubt, reach out to a clinician, caregiver support organization, or a trusted person in your Circle.

Example Walkthrough (6 Weeks) — Project: Center & Circle

This is a fictional-but-realistic walkthrough showing how one person uses the ChatGPT project titled Center & Circle over several weeks. It demonstrates how Threads T.1–T.10 get used in practice.

Quick Map: How a Week Runs

  • Always start in: T.0 Thread: Control Room
  • Only switch threads when needed: T.1–T.8 (deep work), T.9 (Risk Register update), T.10 (Learning Log row)
  • End every week by writing one row into: T.10 Thread: Learning Log

Walkthrough Flowchart (Text-Only) — Weeks → Threads Used

Text-only flowchart in MediaWiki format (no Mermaid required).

Legend
[T.x] = Thread used   •   → = next step in the weekly path   •   (optional) = used only if needed

Overall Loop (Every Week)

Start → [T.0 Control Room] Run W.1→W.7
      → (switch to 1–2 deep-work threads only if needed)
      → [T.9 Risk Register] (optional: add/update 1 row)
      → [T.10 Learning Log] record 1 row
      → End (close until next week)

Week-by-Week Flow (Text Diagram)

Week 1 — “Stop the Drift” (Center)
[T.0] Scan → Signals → Center vs Circle → Micro-Experiment
   → [T.1] (optional: scan feels fuzzy)
   → [T.2] Basics checklist + low-energy defaults
   → [T.10] Log row
Week 2 — “Add a Backup” (Center)
[T.0] Scan → Signals → Center → Micro-Experiment
   → [T.2] Basics baseline
   → [T.3] Redundancy Plan B
   → [T.9] Risk Register row
   → [T.10] Log row
Week 3 — “Warm the Circle” (Circle)
[T.0] Scan → Signals → Circle → Micro-Experiment
   → [T.4] Social Value menu + boundaries
   → [T.5] Scaffolding map + templates + anchor
   → [T.10] Log row
Week 4 — “Repair Fast” (Circle)
[T.0] Scan → Signals → Circle → Micro-Experiment
   → [T.6] Relationship Maintenance rotation + fast repair
   → [T.5] (optional: reuse templates / who-to-call)
   → [T.10] Log row
Week 5 — “Cut Load, Protect Sleep” (Center)
[T.0] Scan → Signals → Center → Micro-Experiment
   → [T.7] Commitments (define done + cadence + stop-rule)
   → [T.2] Basics protect baseline
   → [T.9] (optional: overload risk row)
   → [T.10] Log row
Week 6 — “Review + Renewal” (Monthly Review)
[T.0] Route into review mode
   → [T.8] Review + Renewal scorecard + keep/stop/start
   → [T.9] (optional: stale check → refresh 1 row)
   → [T.10] Log row

Week Summary Table (What got used when)

Week Ending Emphasis Vital Signal(s) Threads Used This Week Micro-Experiment (7 days)
2026-01-10 Center Sleep + Focus T.0, T.1, T.2, T.10 Phone in kitchen by 9:00 PM
2026-01-17 Center Pain + Mobility T.0, T.2, T.3, T.9, T.10 8-minute walk after breakfast
2026-01-24 Circle Meaningful Contact T.0, T.4, T.5, T.10 One “warm touch” message every Tue
2026-01-31 Circle Mood/Irritability T.0, T.6, T.5, T.10 Repair one friction within 24 hours
2026-02-07 Center Sleep + Stress T.0, T.7, T.2, T.9, T.10 Stop-rule + scope reduction on 1 commitment
2026-02-14 Review Stability Score T.0, T.8, T.9, T.10 Monthly review + next-version list

Week 1 (Week Ending 2026-01-10) — First “Real” Run

The Story (Relatable Narrative)

Week 1 starts with a classic situation: nothing is “on fire,” but the person feels a little more scattered than usual. Bedtime has drifted later, the phone keeps the brain “lit up,” and mornings feel foggy. That’s not a crisis — it’s drift. Drift is dangerous because it’s easy to ignore… until it suddenly becomes loud.

So the playbook is used exactly as intended: run the process once, even imperfectly, and let the workflow surface the simplest stabilizing move.

Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale)

  • The goal is not to “fix life.” It’s to find the one dial that predicts stability.
  • Sleep is a multiplier: when it slips, everything gets harder.
  • Environmental changes (like where the phone lives) beat willpower.

Goal

  • Establish baseline: run W.1 → W.7 once, even if imperfect.
  • Use T.1 if the scan feels fuzzy; use T.2 to build “low-energy defaults.”
  • Record first row in T.10.

T.0 (Control Room) — What I paste

Run the Weekly Workflow W.1 → W.7 with me:
W.1 Scan: ask the 3 questions (draining / strengthening / quietly worsening), then summarize.
W.2 Vital Signals: recommend 1–2 signals to track next week.
W.3 Decision Point: choose Center vs Circle emphasis (1 sentence why).
W.4 Micro-Experiment: propose ONE 7-day test (what/when/how to measure).
W.5 Social Touchpoint: draft ONE 10-minute message in my voice.
W.6 Risk Check: name #1 single point of failure + one barrier + one Plan B (for T.9).
W.7 Finish: write one-line log: Signal → Change → Result.
Keep it short and tactical.

W.1 Scan (My answers)

  • Draining: Late-night scrolling; too many small errands; caregiver stress.
  • Strengthening: Morning coffee + quiet; short conversation with a friend; one club task done early.
  • Quietly worsening: Sleep drift (later bedtime); focus feels “foggy.”

W.2 Vital Signals (Chosen)

  • Sleep hours (or bedtime consistency)
  • Focus/clarity (simple 1–5 rating at noon)

W.3 Decision Point

  • Emphasis: Center — sleep/focus drift is predicting instability.

W.4 Micro-Experiment (7 days)

  • Phone in kitchen by 9:00 PM (charge overnight)
  • Measure: “lights out time” + noon focus rating

W.5 Social Touchpoint (10 minutes)

  • One warm message to a friend (no logistics, just connection)

W.6 Risk Check (light)

  • Single point of failure noticed: “All recovery depends on sleep behaving.”
  • Barrier: phone away
  • Plan B: if sleep fails 2 nights, simplify commitments next day

T.2 (Basics) — Protect fundamentals

In T.2 I paste: 

Help me protect the fundamentals: sleep, movement, nutrition/hydration, and meds/appointments (if relevant).
Ask only what you need, then produce:
1) a simple daily checklist,
2) a “Low-Energy Default” version for bad days,
3) one small friction-reduction change for this week.

T.10 (Learning Log) — One row added

Week Ending: 2026-01-10
Vital Signal(s): Sleep / Focus
Micro-Experiment (The Change): Phone in kitchen by 9:00 PM
Result / Observation: 30 min extra sleep; focus improved
Status: KEEP

Week 2 (Week Ending 2026-01-17) — Add Redundancy + First T.9 Entry

The Story (Relatable Narrative)

Week 2 begins with a reality check: even if sleep improves, other systems can wobble. A pain flare shows up and threatens to knock out movement. The person notices an ugly pattern: when pain rises, movement drops; when movement drops, mood and sleep start wobbling again. That’s how a “fine week” turns into a bad one.

So this week is about making the system less brittle: keep the basics stable, add a tiny movement habit, and build a Plan B so one flare doesn’t cascade.

Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale)

  • The vital signals were changed to match the current failure mode (pain/mobility).
  • The experiment is deliberately small (8 minutes) to reduce resistance.
  • Redundancy is introduced early: Plan B prevents panic and prevents cascade.

Goal

  • Keep Center emphasis, but add one “Plan B” backup so life is less brittle.

T.0 — Highlights

  • Draining: Pain flare; errands stacked.
  • Strengthening: Walking felt good once started; sleep slightly better.
  • Quietly worsening: Mobility/pain is affecting mood.

Vital Signals (Chosen)

  • Pain level (0–10)
  • Mobility (minutes walked)

Micro-Experiment (7 days)

  • 8-minute walk after breakfast (every day)
  • Measure: # days completed + pain rating at 5pm

T.3 (Redundancy) — Find single points of failure

In T.3 I paste: 

Help me identify single points of failure in my life (health, home, tech, routines, money, caregiving, transportation).
Then help me add small backups (Plan B’s) that reduce brittleness.
Output a short risk list + fixes.

T.9 (Risk Register) — Add ONE row

In T.9 I paste: 

Add this to my Risk Register: Pain flare-ups are reducing movement and increasing irritability.
Ask me ONLY ONE question if needed.
Then output ONE completed Risk Register row (same columns as my table) with a Review date.

Paste-ready Risk Register row (example):

Risk / Fragility Early Warning Signs Prevention (Barrier) Mitigation (Plan B) Status
Health: Pain flare reduces movement → sleep worsens Pain > 6/10; walking skipped 2 days; irritability up 8-min walk after breakfast + simple stretch “Minimum walk” 3 min + heat/ice + reduce commitments that day MONITOR (Review: 2026-01-24)

T.10 (Learning Log) — One row

Week Ending: 2026-01-17
Vital Signal(s): Pain / Mobility
Micro-Experiment (The Change): 8-minute walk after breakfast
Result / Observation: 5/7 days; pain slightly lower by evening; mood steadier
Status: TWEAK (aim for 6/7; add shoes-by-door)

Week 3 (Week Ending 2026-01-24) — Shift to Circle: Social Value + Scaffolding

The Story (Relatable Narrative)

Week 3 is where the person realizes something important: even if the Center is improving, the Circle can quietly thin out. They aren’t in crisis — but they feel more alone than they want to be. Isolation rarely feels like a “problem” at first; it feels like “being busy.” Then, when stress hits, there’s nobody nearby to buffer it.

So the emphasis shifts to Circle. The vital signal becomes meaningful contact (not “likes,” not admin texts — real warmth). The experiment is tiny: one warm touchpoint every Tuesday.

Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale)

  • The playbook treats connection as infrastructure, not a luxury.
  • “Warm touchpoints” are low-friction and repeatable.
  • Social Value + Scaffolding ensures the person contributes without overload.

Goal

  • Warm the network before isolation becomes a problem.

Emphasis

  • Circle — meaningful contact predicts stability this week.

Vital Signal

  • Meaningful contact (one real conversation or supportive exchange)

Micro-Experiment (7 days)

  • One warm touchpoint every Tuesday (10 minutes)

T.4 (Social Value) — Value menu + boundaries

Help me define a reliable “value menu” I can offer others (skills, roles, contributions)
that also strengthens my stability. Add boundaries so it doesn’t become overload.

T.5 (Social Scaffolding) — Map support + templates

Help me build a simple, reliable support structure:
- inner/outer/institutions map,
- “who to call” list,
- a short “help menu” (what I can ask for / offer),
- two message templates (check-in + ask for help),
- one repeating social anchor.
Keep it low-friction and specific.

T.10 (Learning Log) — One row

Week Ending: 2026-01-24
Vital Signal(s): Meaningful Contact
Micro-Experiment (The Change): One warm touchpoint every Tuesday
Result / Observation: Felt less isolated; got an easy “good to hear from you” reply
Status: KEEP

Week 4 (Week Ending 2026-01-31) — Relationship Maintenance + Fast Repair

The Story (Relatable Narrative)

Week 4 is a subtle one: the person notices irritability rising. Nothing catastrophic happened — it’s accumulated friction. One relationship feels slightly “stiff,” and they find themselves replaying a conversation in their head. That replay loop is a signal: small cracks are forming.

Instead of waiting, they use the playbook to build a habit: repair one friction within 24 hours. The goal is not to win an argument — it’s to prevent drift from becoming distance.

Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale)

  • Repairs are cheapest when they’re early.
  • Scripts reduce emotional labor and prevent defensive spirals.
  • A rotation schedule prevents relationships from being “mood-based.”

Goal

  • Prevent small friction from becoming relationship drift.

Vital Signal

  • Mood/Irritability (1–5 rating, evenings)

Micro-Experiment (7 days)

  • Repair one friction within 24 hours (instead of stewing)

T.6 (Relationship Maintenance) — Rotation + repair script

Help me maintain relationships with a simple rotation schedule (who, when, how).
Draft two quick check-in templates and one ‘fast repair’ script.
Ask a few questions, then propose 5 small touchpoints and one weekend relationship reset.

Example “fast repair” script

Hey — quick note. I think I came across sharper than I meant to earlier.
Sorry about that. I’m dealing with some stress and it leaked out.
I value you, and I want us to be good.

T.10 (Learning Log) — One row

Week Ending: 2026-01-31
Vital Signal(s): Mood/Irritability
Micro-Experiment (The Change): Repair one friction within 24 hours
Result / Observation: One relationship warmed back up; less rumination
Status: KEEP

Week 5 (Week Ending 2026-02-07) — Commitments Audit + Stop-Rule

The Story (Relatable Narrative)

Week 5 catches a sneaky failure mode: overload disguised as meaning. The person notices sleep wobbling again — not because of the phone this time, but because commitments are expanding. They feel resentment and dread. That’s not “laziness.” That’s an early warning sign.

So this week is Center-focused: implement a stop-rule and reduce scope on one commitment. The idea is to protect capacity so reliability remains possible.

Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale)

  • Stop-rules convert vague “I should” into objective triggers.
  • Scope cuts preserve participation without burning out.
  • Risk Register entries make overload visible and reviewable.

Goal

  • Reduce overload that harms sleep/stress.

Emphasis

  • Center — sleep/stress wobble predicts instability.

T.7 (Commitments) — Stop-rule + scope

Help me choose 1–2 small projects/commitments that create meaning without destabilizing me.
For each, define: “done,” the next tiny step, and a weekly cadence.
Include a stop-rule to prevent burnout (if sleep or stress worsens, we reduce scope or pause).

Example stop-rule (paste-ready)

  • If sleep drops below 6 hours for 2 nights OR stress is 4/5 for 2 days → pause or reduce scope for one week.

T.9 (Risk Register) — Optional row

Risk / Fragility Early Warning Signs Prevention (Barrier) Mitigation (Plan B) Status
Overload: Commitments expand → sleep collapses Sleep < 6h for 2 nights; dread; irritability Stop-rule + weekly “yes filter” Reduce scope 50% for 7 days; cancel one non-essential obligation ACTIVE (Review: 2026-02-14)

T.10 (Learning Log) — One row

Week Ending: 2026-02-07
Vital Signal(s): Sleep / Stress
Micro-Experiment (The Change): Stop-rule + reduce one commitment’s scope
Result / Observation: Stress down; sleep steadier; less resentment
Status: KEEP

Week 6 (Week Ending 2026-02-14) — Review + Renewal (Upgradeable Identity)

The Story (Relatable Narrative)

Week 6 is where the playbook turns into a true learning loop. After multiple weeks of experiments, the person now has real data: sleep improved with environmental change, pain cascades were softened by tiny movement, connection improved with one weekly touchpoint, and overload was reduced with stop-rules.

Now the goal isn’t another new tactic — it’s consolidation: keep what works, stop what doesn’t, and choose one small upgrade that expands options without shattering identity.

Why This Week’s Approach Makes Sense (Rationale)

  • Reviews prevent “random walk” life.
  • A simple scorecard makes tradeoffs visible.
  • One renewal action avoids identity-overhaul mania.

Goal

  • Monthly review to refresh direction without overhauls.

T.8 (Review + Renewal) — Scorecard + keep/stop/start

Help me run a monthly/quarterly review to learn what’s working, retire what isn’t, and refresh goals.
Include a simple scorecard, a ‘keep/stop/start’ list, and one renewal action.

Simple scorecard (example)

  • Sleep stability (1–5)
  • Pain/mobility (1–5)
  • Meaningful contact (1–5)
  • Load/capacity balance (1–5)

T.9 (Risk Register) — Monthly stale check (optional)

Risk Register check: Which one row in my Risk Register is most out of date?
Update that row and give it a new Review date. Output the updated row paste-ready.

T.10 (Learning Log) — One row

Week Ending: 2026-02-14
Vital Signal(s): Stability Score (monthly)
Micro-Experiment (The Change): Monthly review + one renewal action chosen
Result / Observation: Clearer priorities; reduced thrash; one upgrade selected
Status: KEEP
Retrieved from "https://primo.ai/index.php?title=Center_and_Circle_Playbook_Walkthrough_Example&oldid=40681"