Difference between revisions of "Offense - Adversarial Threats/Attacks"
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<youtube>hmUPhRtS_pY</youtube> | <youtube>hmUPhRtS_pY</youtube> | ||
<youtube>cjo_u_yT2wQ</youtube> | <youtube>cjo_u_yT2wQ</youtube> | ||
| + | <youtube>KGKlAQ8tH5o</youtube> | ||
== Weaponizing Machine Learning == | == Weaponizing Machine Learning == | ||
Revision as of 20:59, 5 July 2018
- Cybersecurity
- Government Services
- Capabilities
- Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) Problem/Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) Solvers
- Defenses Against Adversarial Examples for Deep Neural Networks
______________________________________________________
- Cleverhans - library for benchmarking the vulnerability of machine learning models to adversarial examples blog
- Adversarial Machine Learning for Anti-Malware Software | nababora @ GitHub
- Deep-pwning/Metasploit | Clarence Chio
- EvadeML.org | University of Virginia
- AdversariaLib: An Open-source Library for the Security Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms Under Attack
- Pattern Recognition and Applications Lab (PRA Lab)
Adversarial examples are inputs to machine learning models that an attacker has intentionally designed to cause the model to make a mistake; they’re like optical illusions for machines. Myth: An attacker must have access to the model to generate adversarial examples. Fact: Adversarial examples generalize across models trained to perform the same task, even if those models have different architectures and were trained on a different training set. This means an attacker can train their own model, generate adversarial examples against it, and then deploy those adversarial examples against a model they do not have access to. -Deep Learning Adversarial Examples – Clarifying Misconceptions | Goodfellow et al.
Weaponizing Machine Learning