Difference between revisions of "Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) Problem/Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) Solvers"

From
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "[http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=~SAT+SMT+Satisfiability+Modulo+Theories+Z3+Reluplex+Deep+Learning+Artificial+Intelligence Youtube search...] * [http://rise4fun.c...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=~SAT+SMT+Satisfiability+Modulo+Theories+Z3+Reluplex+Deep+Learning+Artificial+Intelligence Youtube search...]
 
[http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=~SAT+SMT+Satisfiability+Modulo+Theories+Z3+Reluplex+Deep+Learning+Artificial+Intelligence Youtube search...]
  
 +
* [[Offense - Adversarial Threats/Attacks]]
 
* [http://rise4fun.com/ Rise4Fun - automata concurrency design encoders infrastructure languages security synthesis testing verification language]
 
* [http://rise4fun.com/ Rise4Fun - automata concurrency design encoders infrastructure languages security synthesis testing verification language]
 
* [http://ijcai13.org/files/tutorial_slides/tb1.pdf SAT in AI: high performance search methods with applications]
 
* [http://ijcai13.org/files/tutorial_slides/tb1.pdf SAT in AI: high performance search methods with applications]

Revision as of 21:24, 5 July 2018

Youtube search...


In what seems to be an endless back-and-forth between new adversarial attacks and new defenses against those attacks, we would like a means of formally verifying the robustness of machine learning algorithms to adversarial attacks. In the privacy domain, there is the idea of a differential privacy budget, which quantifies privacy over all possible attacks. In the following three papers, we see attempts at deriving an equivalent benchmark for security, one that will allow the evaluation of defenses against all possible attacks instead of just a specific one. Class 6: Measuring Robustness of ML Models