Difference between revisions of "AI Governance"
m (→AI Goverance) |
m (→AI Goverance) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | ||
|| | || | ||
| − | <youtube> | + | <youtube>AVDIQvJVhso</youtube> |
| − | <b> | + | <b>Why companies should be leading on AI governance | Jade Leung | EA Global: London 2018 |
| − | </b><br> | + | </b><br>Why Companies Should be Leading on AI Governance by Jade Leung from EA Global 2018: London. Centre for Effective Altruism Jade Leung |
|} | |} | ||
|<!-- M --> | |<!-- M --> | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 550px;" | ||
|| | || | ||
| − | <youtube> | + | <youtube>3ZJg-2D2QIA</youtube> |
| − | <b> | + | <b>CPDP 2019: AI Governance: role of legislators, tech companies and standard bodies. |
| − | </b><br> | + | </b><br>Organised by Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, University of Luxembourg Chair Mark Cole, University of Luxembourg (LU) Moderator: Erik Valgaeren, Stibbe (BE) Speakers: Alain Herrmann, National Commission for Data Protection (LU); Christian Wagner, University of Nottingham (UK); Jan Schallaböck, iRights/ISO (DE); Janna Lingenfelder, IBM/ ISO (DE) AI calls for a “coordinated action plan” as recently stated by the European Commission. With its societal and ethical implications, it is a matter of general impact across sectors, going beyond se- curity and trustworthiness or the creation of a regulatory framework. Hence this panel intends to address the topic of AI governance, whether such governance is needed and if so, how to ensure its consistency. It will also discuss whether existing structures and bodies are adequate to deal with such governance, or, if we perhaps need to think about creating new structures and man- date them with this task. Where do we stand and where are we heading in terms of how we are collectively dealing with the soon to be almost ubiquitous phenomenon of AI? Do we need AI governance? If so, who should be in charge of it? Is there a need to ensure consistency of such governance? What are the risks? Do we know them and are we in the right position to address them? Are existing structures/bodies sufficient to address these issues or do we perhaps need to create news ones? |
|} | |} | ||
|<!-- M --> | |<!-- M --> | ||
Revision as of 07:54, 7 September 2020
Youtube search... ...Google search
- Case Studies
- Enterprise Architecture (EA)
- Enterprise Portfolio Management (EPM)
- Architectures supporting machine learning
- Evaluation
- Tackling artificial intelligence using architecture | Daniel Lambert - CIO
AI Goverance
|
|
|
|
|
|