Law - Revision history

BPeat at 13:06, 23 March 2024

2024-03-23T13:06:45Z

BPeat: /* Generative AI */

2023-10-02T11:13:17Z

‎Generative AI

BPeat at 23:49, 8 September 2023

2023-09-08T23:49:12Z

BPeat at 22:47, 3 September 2023

2023-09-03T22:47:51Z

BPeat: /* Intellectual Property (IP) Ownership */

2023-09-02T11:52:39Z

‎Intellectual Property (IP) Ownership

BPeat at 11:36, 17 August 2023

2023-08-17T11:36:33Z

BPeat at 16:41, 21 July 2023

2023-07-21T16:41:28Z

BPeat: /* Generative AI */

2023-07-11T11:30:33Z

‎Generative AI

BPeat at 11:26, 11 July 2023

2023-07-11T11:26:18Z

BPeat at 11:25, 11 July 2023

2023-07-11T11:25:38Z

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 * [[Writing/Publishing#Legally| Writing/Publishing Legally]]
 * [[Cybersecurity]] ... [[Open-Source Intelligence - OSINT |OSINT]] ... [[Cybersecurity Frameworks, Architectures & Roadmaps | Frameworks]] ... [[Cybersecurity References|References]] ... [[Offense - Adversarial Threats/Attacks| Offense]] ... [[National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)|NIST]] ... [[U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)| DHS]] ... [[Screening; Passenger, Luggage, & Cargo|Screening]] ... [[Law Enforcement]] ... [[Government Services|Government]] ... [[Defense]] ... [[Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)#Cybersecurity & Acquisition Lifecycle Integration| Lifecycle Integration]] ... [[Cybersecurity Companies/Products|Products]] ... [[Cybersecurity: Evaluating & Selling|Evaluating]]
-* [[Assistants]] ... [[Personal Companions]] ... [[Agents]]  ... [[Negotiation]] ... [[LangChain]]
+* [[Agents]] ... [[Robotic Process Automation (RPA)|Robotic Process Automation]] ... [[Assistants]] ... [[Personal Companions]] ... [[Personal Productivity|Productivity]] ... [[Email]] ... [[Negotiation]] ... [[LangChain]]
 * [[Other Challenges]] in Artificial Intelligence
 * [[Bias and Variances]]
@@ Line 116: / Line 116: @@
 ||
 <youtube>wwbr0fombFs</youtube>
-<b>The world’s first AI legal [[Assistants|assistant]] | Andrew Arruda | TED Institute
+<b>The world’s first AI legal [[assistant]] | Andrew Arruda | TED Institute
-</b><br>s a lawyer, Andrew Arruda too often saw the scales of justice tip in favor of the wealthy and partnered with a computer scientist to create the world’s first artificially intelligent legal [[Assistants|assistant]], ROSS. By speeding up legal research, Arruda wants ROSS to make the practice of law cheaper and fulfill the original promise of “justice for all.”  TED@IBM was a TED-curated event produced in partnership with IBM. The third installment of TED@IBM brought a diverse collection of speakers and performers who recognize that ingenuity starts with one thing: a spark. And regardless of where the spark takes hold, inspiration demands action to reach its greatest potential.  About the TED Institute: We know that innovative ideas and fresh approaches to challenging problems can be discovered inside visionary companies around the world. The TED Institute helps surface and share these insights. Every year, TED works with a group of select companies and foundations to identify internal ideators, inventors, connectors, and creators. Drawing on the same rigorous regimen that has prepared speakers for the TED main stage, TED Institute works closely with each partner, overseeing curation and providing intensive one-on-one talk [[development]] to sharpen and fine tune ideas.
+</b><br>s a lawyer, Andrew Arruda too often saw the scales of justice tip in favor of the wealthy and partnered with a computer scientist to create the world’s first artificially intelligent legal [[assistant]], ROSS. By speeding up legal research, Arruda wants ROSS to make the practice of law cheaper and fulfill the original promise of “justice for all.”  TED@IBM was a TED-curated event produced in partnership with IBM. The third installment of TED@IBM brought a diverse collection of speakers and performers who recognize that ingenuity starts with one thing: a spark. And regardless of where the spark takes hold, inspiration demands action to reach its greatest potential.  About the TED Institute: We know that innovative ideas and fresh approaches to challenging problems can be discovered inside visionary companies around the world. The TED Institute helps surface and share these insights. Every year, TED works with a group of select companies and foundations to identify internal ideators, inventors, connectors, and creators. Drawing on the same rigorous regimen that has prepared speakers for the TED main stage, TED Institute works closely with each partner, overseeing curation and providing intensive one-on-one talk [[development]] to sharpen and fine tune ideas.
 |}
 |<!-- M -->
@@ Line 271: / Line 271: @@
 </b><br>United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit  2017 Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference
-Artificial Intelligence Today—Tomorrow's Legal Challenges of Machine Learning Once an area limited primarily to academic study, Artificial Intelligence ("AI") now enables a constellation of technologies that we take for granted such as Internet search algorithms; computer and phone speech [[Assistants|assistants]]; self-driving cars; health care diagnostics; investment platforms; industrial robots; and home heating; cooling and security. This is just the beginning. AI technology is growing rapidly. As it grows, it will not merely be an aid to human activity, but a powerful force that reshapes our world, our thinking, our lives, and our constitutional principles. In this panel presentation we discuss what AI is, its status today, what the future might hold, and some of the critical issues courts may face in addressing the impact of AI. Introduction: Michelle M. Pettit, Assistant U.S. Attorney, CAS At-Large Member, Conference Executive Committee
+Artificial Intelligence Today—Tomorrow's Legal Challenges of Machine Learning Once an area limited primarily to academic study, Artificial Intelligence ("AI") now enables a constellation of technologies that we take for granted such as Internet search algorithms; computer and phone speech [[assistants]]; self-driving cars; health care diagnostics; investment platforms; industrial robots; and home heating; cooling and security. This is just the beginning. AI technology is growing rapidly. As it grows, it will not merely be an aid to human activity, but a powerful force that reshapes our world, our thinking, our lives, and our constitutional principles. In this panel presentation we discuss what AI is, its status today, what the future might hold, and some of the critical issues courts may face in addressing the impact of AI. Introduction: Michelle M. Pettit, Assistant U.S. Attorney, CAS At-Large Member, Conference Executive Committee
 Speakers:

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 ** [https://openworldai.com/plugins/lawyer-pr LawyerPR ChatGPT Plugin] ... assess various lawyers and law firms in Japan
 ** [https://www.dlapiper.com/en/news/2023/03/dla-piper-to-utilize-cocounsel-the-groundbreaking-ai-legal-assistant-powered-by-openai-technology DLA Piper to utilize CoCounsel, the groundbreaking AI legal assistant powered by OpenAI Technology | DLA Piper]
-** https://www.harvey.ai/ Harvey.ai]
+** [https://www.harvey.ai/ Harvey.ai]
 = Advancements =

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 * [[Bias and Variances]]
 * [[Policy]]   ... [[Policy vs Plan]] ... [[Constitutional AI]] ... [[Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO)]] ... [[Policy Gradient (PG)]] ... [[Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)]]
-* [[Singularity]] ... [[Artificial Consciousness / Sentience|Sentience]] ... [[Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)| AGI]] ... [[Inside Out - Curious Optimistic Reasoning| Curious Reasoning]] ... [[Emergence]] ... [[Moonshots]] ... [[Explainable / Interpretable AI|Explainable AI]] ...  [[Algorithm Administration#Automated Learning|Automated Learning]]
+* [[Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) to Singularity]] ... [[Inside Out - Curious Optimistic Reasoning| Curious Reasoning]] ... [[Emergence]] ... [[Moonshots]] ... [[Explainable / Interpretable AI|Explainable AI]] ...  [[Algorithm Administration#Automated Learning|Automated Learning]]
 * [[Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)#Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)|Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)]]
 * [[Excel]] ... [[LangChain#Documents|Documents]] ... [[Database|Database; Vector & Relational]] ... [[Graph]] ... [[LlamaIndex]]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 * [[Risk, Compliance and Regulation]]  ... [[Ethics]]  ... [[Privacy]]  ... [[Law]]  ... [[AI Governance]]  ... [[AI Verification and Validation]]
 * [[Law Enforcement]]
-* [[Writing / Publishing#Legally| Writing / Publishing Legally]]
+* [[Writing/Publishing#Legally| Writing/Publishing Legally]]
 * [[Cybersecurity]] ... [[Open-Source Intelligence - OSINT |OSINT]] ... [[Cybersecurity Frameworks, Architectures & Roadmaps | Frameworks]] ... [[Cybersecurity References|References]] ... [[Offense - Adversarial Threats/Attacks| Offense]] ... [[National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)|NIST]] ... [[U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)| DHS]] ... [[Screening; Passenger, Luggage, & Cargo|Screening]] ... [[Law Enforcement]] ... [[Government Services|Government]] ... [[Defense]] ... [[Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)#Cybersecurity & Acquisition Lifecycle Integration| Lifecycle Integration]] ... [[Cybersecurity Companies/Products|Products]] ... [[Cybersecurity: Evaluating & Selling|Evaluating]]
 * [[Assistants]] ... [[Personal Companions]] ... [[Agents]]  ... [[Negotiation]] ... [[LangChain]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 2 September 2023
Line 287:		Line 287:

	...recent artificial intelligence case, in which the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that an AI system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. Unlike US patent law, US copyright law does not have an express requirement of human authorship; however, US courts and the US Copyright Office generally operate on the basis of this requirement and deny registrations of works not created by humans. In fact, the Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices—a manual produced by the US Copyright Office, intended for use primarily by the Copyright Office staff as a general guide to policies and procedures such as registration, deposit and recordation—states, “the term ‘authorship’ implies that, for a work to be copyrightable, it must owe its origin to a human being”. Materials produced solely by nature, by plants, or by animals are not copyrightable. The metaverse could have virtual creations by avatars and AI aspects built into them. If such creations are deemed to be AI creations and not human creations, they may not be allowed certain types of intellectual property protection. [https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/a-brief-overview-of-the-metaverse-and-9541020/ A Brief Overview of the Metaverse and the Legal Challenges It Will Present \| Rahul Kapoor & Shokoh Yaghoubi - JDSUPRA]		...recent artificial intelligence case, in which the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that an AI system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. Unlike US patent law, US copyright law does not have an express requirement of human authorship; however, US courts and the US Copyright Office generally operate on the basis of this requirement and deny registrations of works not created by humans. In fact, the Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices—a manual produced by the US Copyright Office, intended for use primarily by the Copyright Office staff as a general guide to policies and procedures such as registration, deposit and recordation—states, “the term ‘authorship’ implies that, for a work to be copyrightable, it must owe its origin to a human being”. Materials produced solely by nature, by plants, or by animals are not copyrightable. The metaverse could have virtual creations by avatars and AI aspects built into them. If such creations are deemed to be AI creations and not human creations, they may not be allowed certain types of intellectual property protection. [https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/a-brief-overview-of-the-metaverse-and-9541020/ A Brief Overview of the Metaverse and the Legal Challenges It Will Present \| Rahul Kapoor & Shokoh Yaghoubi - JDSUPRA]
		+
		+	== <span id="Amnesty International"></span>Amnesty International ==
		+
		+	Amnesty International is fighting the use of AI to abuse human rights in a number of ways, including:
		+
		+	* Research and advocacy: Amnesty International conducts research on the impact of AI on human rights, and uses this research to advocate for policies and practices that protect human rights. For example, Amnesty International has called for a ban on the use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement, and for the development of ethical AI principles that are based on human rights.
		+	* Collaboration with other organizations: Amnesty International collaborates with other organizations, such as the European Parliament and the United Nations, to raise awareness of the human rights risks of AI and to advocate for solutions.
		+	* Legal action: Amnesty International has taken legal action against companies and governments that use AI in ways that violate human rights. For example, Amnesty International has filed a lawsuit against Clearview AI, a company that collects and sells facial recognition data without people's consent.
		+	* Public education: Amnesty International educates the public about the human rights risks of AI, and encourages people to take action to protect their rights. For example, Amnesty International has launched a campaign to raise awareness of the use of AI in mass surveillance.
		+
		+
		+	Amnesty International's work to fight the use of AI to abuse human rights is important because AI has the potential to be a powerful tool for good or for harm. By working to ensure that AI is used in a way that respects human rights, Amnesty International is helping to create a more just and equitable world.
		+
		+	Here are some specific examples of Amnesty International's work on this issue:
		+
		+	* In 2019, Amnesty International published a report called "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Rights". The report found that AI is being used in ways that violate a wide range of human rights, including the right to privacy, the right to freedom of expression, and the right to a fair trial.
		+	* In 2020, Amnesty International launched a campaign called "Ban the Scan". The campaign calls for a ban on the use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement.
		+	* In 2021, Amnesty International filed a lawsuit against Clearview AI, a company that collects and sells facial recognition data without people's consent. The lawsuit alleges that Clearview AI's practices violate the privacy rights of millions of people.

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 * [[Singularity]] ... [[Artificial Consciousness / Sentience|Sentience]] ... [[Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)| AGI]] ... [[Inside Out - Curious Optimistic Reasoning| Curious Reasoning]] ... [[Emergence]] ... [[Moonshots]] ... [[Explainable / Interpretable AI|Explainable AI]] ...  [[Algorithm Administration#Automated Learning|Automated Learning]]
 * [[Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)#Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)|Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)]]
-* [[Excel]] ... [[LangChain#Documents|Documents]] ... [[Database]] ... [[Graph]] ... [[LlamaIndex]]
+* [[Excel]] ... [[LangChain#Documents|Documents]] ... [[Database|Database; Vector & Relational]] ... [[Graph]] ... [[LlamaIndex]]
 * [[Blockchain]]
 * [https://www.legalsifter.com/ LegalSifter]
-* [https://premonition.ai/ knowsPremonition] generated the World's largest litigation database, and able to read and analyze over 50,000 documents a second.
+* [https://premonition.ai/ knowsPremonition] generated the World's largest litigation [[database]], and able to read and analyze over 50,000 documents a second.
 * [https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/12/232890-ai-judges-and-juries/fulltext AI Judges and Juries | Logan Kugler - Communications of the ACM]
 * [https://interestingengineering.com/ai-vs-lawyers-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-and-law AI vs. Lawyers: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Law | Merve A. Kızrak - Interesting Engineering]

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 * [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-powered-robot-lawyer-takes-its-first-court-case/ AI-powered "robot" lawyer will be first of its kind to represent defendant in court | Megan Ceerullo - CBS NEWS]
 * [https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/02/chatgpt-law-humans-trust-ai-judges.html Would Humans Trust an A.I. Judge? More Easily Than You Think | A. Stremitzer, B. Chen, & K. Tobia - Slate]
 * [[Generative AI]]  ... [[OpenAI]]'s [[ChatGPT]] ... [[Perplexity]]  ... [[Microsoft]]'s [[Bing]] ... [[You]] ...[[Google]]'s [[Bard]] ... [[Baidu]]'s [[Ernie]]
 ** [https://www.fox9.com/news/chatgpt-goes-to-university-of-minnesota-law-school-and-passes-the-final-exams ChatGPT goes to University of Minnesota law school and passes final exams | Corin Hoggard - FOX 9 KMSP]
@@ Line 46: / Line 47: @@
 ** [https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/02/generative-ai-is-coming-for-the-lawyers/ Generative AI is coming for the lawyers | Chris Stokel-Walker - Wired]   ... Large law firms are using a tool made by [[OpenAI]] to research and write legal documents
 ** [https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/03/in-generative-ai-legal-wild-west-lawsuits-are-just-getting-started.html In generative AI legal Wild West, the courtroom battles are just getting started | Ellen Sheng - CNBC]
 {|<!-- T -->
 | valign="top" |